The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Does not appear notable, although this is a vary tough case to decide. Draftifying can be considered if this article can be improved. I need more opinions on this.
4thfile4thrank (
talk)
02:13, 6 December 2020 (UTC)PLEASE NOTE: THIS IS A DIFFERENT AHMED YUSUF THAN THE 1ST NOMINATION!!!reply
Speedy Delete and salt As noted, this is not the same subject as the original AfD; this subject what as far as I can tell is a state-level government bureaucrat, and as such, doesn't meet
WP:NPOL, nor do the sources support
WP:GNG, as they are passing mentions. I'd speedied this before as there were no credible claims of any notability. OhNoitsJamieTalk02:29, 6 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete: Unelected statewide apointees are not automatically deemed notable. I find the statement "federal commisioner of Nigeria" misleading, as he is not part of the federal ministers which are presumed notable.
HandsomeBoy (
talk)
14:25, 6 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete and salt: Autobiography; promotional only; fails
WP:NPOL, and keeps being recreated. Of note,
this redirect, which was originally another version of the same article (I believe an attempt to get around the original speedy deletion of this article), should also be removed assuming this AfD determines deletion as the outcome.
Jmertel23 (
talk)
17:44, 6 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Speedy delete and salt — Autobiographical article of a non notable office holder who doesn’t satisfy
WP:NPOL or any known notability criteria for inclusion. @
Ohnoitsjamie, If article creator could be indef blocked for SPA self-promo that would be a great idea as well. Prior now the article had been deleted 6 times. @
4thfile4thrank, did you take a look at the talk page of the article creator? Celestina007 (
talk)
18:40, 6 December 2020 (UTC)reply
@
4thfile4thrank: Procedurally, there is an advantage to having this close "normally" as "deleted as a result of a deletion discussion" rather than using a speedy-deletion criteria. Personally, I don't think it would do much harm to give the page author a few more days to surprise me and probably the rest of us by finding sources that would demonstrate that this person does in fact meet
WP:N. I don't know if search engines are indexing the article or not, but if they are, they are also indexing the "deletion" and "notability" templates, so it's not "helping" this person's "publicity engine" if it gets indexed. (it's marked "noindex")
davidwr/(
talk)/(
contribs)
18:56, 6 December 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Does not appear notable, although this is a vary tough case to decide. Draftifying can be considered if this article can be improved. I need more opinions on this.
4thfile4thrank (
talk)
02:13, 6 December 2020 (UTC)PLEASE NOTE: THIS IS A DIFFERENT AHMED YUSUF THAN THE 1ST NOMINATION!!!reply
Speedy Delete and salt As noted, this is not the same subject as the original AfD; this subject what as far as I can tell is a state-level government bureaucrat, and as such, doesn't meet
WP:NPOL, nor do the sources support
WP:GNG, as they are passing mentions. I'd speedied this before as there were no credible claims of any notability. OhNoitsJamieTalk02:29, 6 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete: Unelected statewide apointees are not automatically deemed notable. I find the statement "federal commisioner of Nigeria" misleading, as he is not part of the federal ministers which are presumed notable.
HandsomeBoy (
talk)
14:25, 6 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete and salt: Autobiography; promotional only; fails
WP:NPOL, and keeps being recreated. Of note,
this redirect, which was originally another version of the same article (I believe an attempt to get around the original speedy deletion of this article), should also be removed assuming this AfD determines deletion as the outcome.
Jmertel23 (
talk)
17:44, 6 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Speedy delete and salt — Autobiographical article of a non notable office holder who doesn’t satisfy
WP:NPOL or any known notability criteria for inclusion. @
Ohnoitsjamie, If article creator could be indef blocked for SPA self-promo that would be a great idea as well. Prior now the article had been deleted 6 times. @
4thfile4thrank, did you take a look at the talk page of the article creator? Celestina007 (
talk)
18:40, 6 December 2020 (UTC)reply
@
4thfile4thrank: Procedurally, there is an advantage to having this close "normally" as "deleted as a result of a deletion discussion" rather than using a speedy-deletion criteria. Personally, I don't think it would do much harm to give the page author a few more days to surprise me and probably the rest of us by finding sources that would demonstrate that this person does in fact meet
WP:N. I don't know if search engines are indexing the article or not, but if they are, they are also indexing the "deletion" and "notability" templates, so it's not "helping" this person's "publicity engine" if it gets indexed. (it's marked "noindex")
davidwr/(
talk)/(
contribs)
18:56, 6 December 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.