The result was delete all and redirect to the appropriate campus, with the exception of
Sonoma State University Academic Foundation, for which the result was no consensus keep. No one supporting keep has shown significant coverage in reliable sources for these organizations.
T. Canens (
talk) 03:09, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
reply
Series of stubs about CSU support organizations; unnecessary and non-notable fork of content at parent university articles. MelanieN ( talk) 02:27, 7 June 2010 (UTC) reply
I am also nominating the following related pages because they are all stubs about non-notable support organizations for schools in the California State University system, which either duplicate content which is already in the parent university article, or can readily be merged into the parent article. If a consolidated list of CSU support organizations is desired, the names could be added to the article Auxiliary Organizations Association.
Comment I have added third party sources for AS Bakersfield. I will certainly be able to do the same for all the others. They are all located in cities with newspapers, etcetera. Will this suffice to re-evaluate this proposal? Greg Bard 03:01, 9 June 2010 (UTC) reply
Comment -- I would like to see this debate re-listed. The proposal involves several articles. I think that the fact that these organizations are among the most active in their own community and region ensures their notability. The student governments hold annual elections for officers. These are governments we are talking about here. Greg Bard 20:25, 13 June 2010 (UTC) reply
Comment -- I feel I should also point out that the reason why a university has auxiliary organizations in the first place is specifically so as to create an entity that is separate from the university. Placing the information about these entities in the same article as their university defeats their efforts. Greg Bard 00:13, 15 June 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete all and redirect to the appropriate campus, with the exception of
Sonoma State University Academic Foundation, for which the result was no consensus keep. No one supporting keep has shown significant coverage in reliable sources for these organizations.
T. Canens (
talk) 03:09, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
reply
Series of stubs about CSU support organizations; unnecessary and non-notable fork of content at parent university articles. MelanieN ( talk) 02:27, 7 June 2010 (UTC) reply
I am also nominating the following related pages because they are all stubs about non-notable support organizations for schools in the California State University system, which either duplicate content which is already in the parent university article, or can readily be merged into the parent article. If a consolidated list of CSU support organizations is desired, the names could be added to the article Auxiliary Organizations Association.
Comment I have added third party sources for AS Bakersfield. I will certainly be able to do the same for all the others. They are all located in cities with newspapers, etcetera. Will this suffice to re-evaluate this proposal? Greg Bard 03:01, 9 June 2010 (UTC) reply
Comment -- I would like to see this debate re-listed. The proposal involves several articles. I think that the fact that these organizations are among the most active in their own community and region ensures their notability. The student governments hold annual elections for officers. These are governments we are talking about here. Greg Bard 20:25, 13 June 2010 (UTC) reply
Comment -- I feel I should also point out that the reason why a university has auxiliary organizations in the first place is specifically so as to create an entity that is separate from the university. Placing the information about these entities in the same article as their university defeats their efforts. Greg Bard 00:13, 15 June 2010 (UTC) reply