The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep All per
WP:GEOLAND and close. This AfD is a massive abuse of the AfD process with an objective to delete enmasse village stubs in one go without giving time for discussion. Agol is a decent sized village with a population of 4500,[1] Can be located as this
Google Map link shows. Has its own post office and Census data. Such stubs should be expanded and not deleted. If you cant be bothered to expand them then let some one else do it.
Ramol has a verifiable link that states it had a population of 27 thousand in 2001. Obvious and easy keep per
WP:GEOLAND. If there are one or two stubs that you feel genuinely merit a deletion then please nominate them separately. This AfD Bunching is unacceptable to me.--DBigXrayᗙ15:59, 22 October 2019 (UTC)reply
Comment: according to
WP:GEOLAND, populated, legally recognized places are typically presumed to be notable. But: it also says populated places without legal recognition are considered on a case-by-case basis in accordance with the GNG. Examples may include subdivisions, business parks, housing developments, informal regions of a state, unofficial neighbourhoods etc Indian government or census doesnt have the concept of "neighbourhoods". However, government/census recognises "nagar", "colony", "mohalla" (they are mostly used as synonyms for each-other though). So, if the subject is part of city or village, or the so called "neighbourhood", then
WP:GNG should be applied, otherwise everything deserves an article per
WP:GEOLAND. —usernamekiran
(talk)16:44, 22 October 2019 (UTC)reply
Keep all and nominate one by one if required. @
Nizil Shah:, it would be really hard to discuss more than one article at one go. May I suggest that you withdraw the bulk nomination and then gradually nominate them individually if you feel they are not notable?. In some cases, if a standalone article is not feasible (particularly for small neighbourhoods), it could be merged into the article of a larger entity. If possible please nominate them slowly (like 2 or 3 a week), since it takes time to search for sources as well. I am willing to help out with finding references, but it will be difficult to find all in one go.--
DreamLinker (
talk)
17:00, 22 October 2019 (UTC)reply
Procedural Keep as the articles nominated in bulk do not fall under same category to have a common AFD. Some are census towns and some are neighbourhoods within census towns. Both of these have different notability standards and we shouldn't waste editors' time in discussing all together. §§
Dharmadhyaksha§§ {
Talk /
Edits}
03:22, 23 October 2019 (UTC)reply
Withdrawing nomination. After reading all comments, I agree that bulk nomination will not be fruitful. I will nominate one by one. Regards,-
Nizil (
talk)
06:09, 23 October 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep All per
WP:GEOLAND and close. This AfD is a massive abuse of the AfD process with an objective to delete enmasse village stubs in one go without giving time for discussion. Agol is a decent sized village with a population of 4500,[1] Can be located as this
Google Map link shows. Has its own post office and Census data. Such stubs should be expanded and not deleted. If you cant be bothered to expand them then let some one else do it.
Ramol has a verifiable link that states it had a population of 27 thousand in 2001. Obvious and easy keep per
WP:GEOLAND. If there are one or two stubs that you feel genuinely merit a deletion then please nominate them separately. This AfD Bunching is unacceptable to me.--DBigXrayᗙ15:59, 22 October 2019 (UTC)reply
Comment: according to
WP:GEOLAND, populated, legally recognized places are typically presumed to be notable. But: it also says populated places without legal recognition are considered on a case-by-case basis in accordance with the GNG. Examples may include subdivisions, business parks, housing developments, informal regions of a state, unofficial neighbourhoods etc Indian government or census doesnt have the concept of "neighbourhoods". However, government/census recognises "nagar", "colony", "mohalla" (they are mostly used as synonyms for each-other though). So, if the subject is part of city or village, or the so called "neighbourhood", then
WP:GNG should be applied, otherwise everything deserves an article per
WP:GEOLAND. —usernamekiran
(talk)16:44, 22 October 2019 (UTC)reply
Keep all and nominate one by one if required. @
Nizil Shah:, it would be really hard to discuss more than one article at one go. May I suggest that you withdraw the bulk nomination and then gradually nominate them individually if you feel they are not notable?. In some cases, if a standalone article is not feasible (particularly for small neighbourhoods), it could be merged into the article of a larger entity. If possible please nominate them slowly (like 2 or 3 a week), since it takes time to search for sources as well. I am willing to help out with finding references, but it will be difficult to find all in one go.--
DreamLinker (
talk)
17:00, 22 October 2019 (UTC)reply
Procedural Keep as the articles nominated in bulk do not fall under same category to have a common AFD. Some are census towns and some are neighbourhoods within census towns. Both of these have different notability standards and we shouldn't waste editors' time in discussing all together. §§
Dharmadhyaksha§§ {
Talk /
Edits}
03:22, 23 October 2019 (UTC)reply
Withdrawing nomination. After reading all comments, I agree that bulk nomination will not be fruitful. I will nominate one by one. Regards,-
Nizil (
talk)
06:09, 23 October 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.