From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 00:13, 9 May 2018 (UTC) reply

Agatha Magtibay Almeda

Agatha Magtibay Almeda (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a fictional character, which is written entirely in-universe and shows no evidence of real-world context for what would make her notable enough to have her own standalone article separately from already being discussed in The Blood Sisters (TV series). The sourcing here isn't cutting it, either: two of the four footnotes are to the show's own self-published content about itself; one is to a profile of the actress (not the character) on a user-generated "social news network"; and one is to a reaggregation of content about the actress originally published on a WP:BLOG -- which means that exactly zero of them are reliable and notability-supporting sources. As always, making a fictional character notable enough for her own article requires context and impact in the real world, not just the ability to write "biographical" content about her life inside her own fictional universe. Bearcat ( talk) 15:07, 15 April 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 16:40, 15 April 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 16:40, 15 April 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 16:40, 15 April 2018 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles ( talk) 02:14, 23 April 2018 (UTC) reply
Delete per nom. - WayKurat ( talk) 01:51, 27 April 2018 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J04n( talk page) 13:52, 1 May 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 00:13, 9 May 2018 (UTC) reply

Agatha Magtibay Almeda

Agatha Magtibay Almeda (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a fictional character, which is written entirely in-universe and shows no evidence of real-world context for what would make her notable enough to have her own standalone article separately from already being discussed in The Blood Sisters (TV series). The sourcing here isn't cutting it, either: two of the four footnotes are to the show's own self-published content about itself; one is to a profile of the actress (not the character) on a user-generated "social news network"; and one is to a reaggregation of content about the actress originally published on a WP:BLOG -- which means that exactly zero of them are reliable and notability-supporting sources. As always, making a fictional character notable enough for her own article requires context and impact in the real world, not just the ability to write "biographical" content about her life inside her own fictional universe. Bearcat ( talk) 15:07, 15 April 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 16:40, 15 April 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 16:40, 15 April 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 16:40, 15 April 2018 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles ( talk) 02:14, 23 April 2018 (UTC) reply
Delete per nom. - WayKurat ( talk) 01:51, 27 April 2018 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J04n( talk page) 13:52, 1 May 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook