- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Hey man im josh ( talk) 21:58, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
Adverse vaccine reactions in pets
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Adverse vaccine reactions in pets ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
From a discussion at WP:FTN, appears to be a WP:POVFORK of vaccination of dogs and feline vaccination. Adverse reactions, such as they are, can be decently discussed in those articles. To be sure, the dogs and cats compilation here is something of a WP:POVPUSH by the article writer who seemed to have written the article with the express purpose of pushing a POV opposed to vaccination of pets generally. jps ( talk) 15:30, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Animal and Medicine. jps ( talk) 15:30, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per what I said at FTN: It looks like all the sources deal with cats or dogs separately (not "pets"), and we already have articles about vaccination of dogs and feline vaccination (where the creator of this page has added a lot of the same content already). — Rhododendrites talk \\ 17:30, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. This is such a WP:POVFORK with the same information from the above articles. I see no point to having the adverse affects of pet vaccinations, which differ per species, all in one article. Conyo14 ( talk) 17:38, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support article has guidebook/POV sections as well as uncited sections. Traumnovelle ( talk) 20:57, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete - it's not entirely bad, but everyone knows in 2024 that we don't make separate articles that synthesizes data and research. Bearian ( talk) 20:09, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: A POV content fork. Owen× ☎ 00:14, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Hey man im josh ( talk) 21:58, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
Adverse vaccine reactions in pets
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Adverse vaccine reactions in pets ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
From a discussion at WP:FTN, appears to be a WP:POVFORK of vaccination of dogs and feline vaccination. Adverse reactions, such as they are, can be decently discussed in those articles. To be sure, the dogs and cats compilation here is something of a WP:POVPUSH by the article writer who seemed to have written the article with the express purpose of pushing a POV opposed to vaccination of pets generally. jps ( talk) 15:30, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Animal and Medicine. jps ( talk) 15:30, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per what I said at FTN: It looks like all the sources deal with cats or dogs separately (not "pets"), and we already have articles about vaccination of dogs and feline vaccination (where the creator of this page has added a lot of the same content already). — Rhododendrites talk \\ 17:30, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. This is such a WP:POVFORK with the same information from the above articles. I see no point to having the adverse affects of pet vaccinations, which differ per species, all in one article. Conyo14 ( talk) 17:38, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support article has guidebook/POV sections as well as uncited sections. Traumnovelle ( talk) 20:57, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete - it's not entirely bad, but everyone knows in 2024 that we don't make separate articles that synthesizes data and research. Bearian ( talk) 20:09, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: A POV content fork. Owen× ☎ 00:14, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.