The result was Keep. Although there are still many sources in this article which are not reliable by WP standards, there are an equal number which are. These sourcing issues, as well as unsourced or poorly sourced claims, should be dealt with outside of this AfD. The evidence presented in a variety of reliable sources is enough to qualify as WP:Verifiability of potentially contentious claims, which themselves display that the subject meets WP:BIO. As it stands the nominator's main issue, has been proven incorrect and all delete votes appear to be based off of this (now) erroneous claim Panyd The muffin is not subtle 01:08, 2 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:BIO. jps ( talk) 16:50, 24 December 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep. Although there are still many sources in this article which are not reliable by WP standards, there are an equal number which are. These sourcing issues, as well as unsourced or poorly sourced claims, should be dealt with outside of this AfD. The evidence presented in a variety of reliable sources is enough to qualify as WP:Verifiability of potentially contentious claims, which themselves display that the subject meets WP:BIO. As it stands the nominator's main issue, has been proven incorrect and all delete votes appear to be based off of this (now) erroneous claim Panyd The muffin is not subtle 01:08, 2 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:BIO. jps ( talk) 16:50, 24 December 2010 (UTC) reply