- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 16:50, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
Actionmint
- Actionmint ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Notability of this SaaS product is not established by citations to scondary reliable sources with no connection to article's subject. Searching on the web does not reveal other sources that could contribute to the article. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff ( talk• track) 08:29, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - does not seem to pass GNG/PRODUCT. --— Rhododendrites talk | 15:05, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 15:14, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 15:14, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Fails GNG/Product. Article reads like an advert. WP is not a free publicity site. SW3 5DL ( talk) 16:53, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - software article of unclear notability, lacking independent references. The current refs are a developer's site, a blog, and crunchbase, none of which are significant RS coverage, and a search turned up no significant coverage in reliable sources. Article was created by an SPA as possibly promotional. Dialectric ( talk) 09:45, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 16:50, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
Actionmint
- Actionmint ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Notability of this SaaS product is not established by citations to scondary reliable sources with no connection to article's subject. Searching on the web does not reveal other sources that could contribute to the article. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff ( talk• track) 08:29, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - does not seem to pass GNG/PRODUCT. --— Rhododendrites talk | 15:05, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 15:14, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 15:14, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Fails GNG/Product. Article reads like an advert. WP is not a free publicity site. SW3 5DL ( talk) 16:53, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - software article of unclear notability, lacking independent references. The current refs are a developer's site, a blog, and crunchbase, none of which are significant RS coverage, and a search turned up no significant coverage in reliable sources. Article was created by an SPA as possibly promotional. Dialectric ( talk) 09:45, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.