- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Complex/ Rational 18:48, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Achievement motivation inventory
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Achievement motivation inventory ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Articles have multiple big issues with it. Starting with WP:NPOV as the article is holding a neutral point of view, becoming incomprehensible, and hanging from a thread. The article lacks incline citations per WP:IC AND, and it relies on a single source. There needs to be some sort of conversation about this article because I already WP:PROD it, but unfortunately, it got deleted. GoodHue291 ( talk) 17:14, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Psychology-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:54, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: I don't personally find every article worth saving. I've been watching this one for awhile, and questioning the motives by which it was created. It appears spammy to me. This is underscored by the fact—per the nom—that the only source seems to be the very individuals who created the test. — void xor 16:13, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: Subject does not meet the WP:GNG due to a lack of WP:SIGCOV. Let'srun ( talk) 17:28, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Complex/ Rational 18:48, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Achievement motivation inventory
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Achievement motivation inventory ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Articles have multiple big issues with it. Starting with WP:NPOV as the article is holding a neutral point of view, becoming incomprehensible, and hanging from a thread. The article lacks incline citations per WP:IC AND, and it relies on a single source. There needs to be some sort of conversation about this article because I already WP:PROD it, but unfortunately, it got deleted. GoodHue291 ( talk) 17:14, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Psychology-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:54, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: I don't personally find every article worth saving. I've been watching this one for awhile, and questioning the motives by which it was created. It appears spammy to me. This is underscored by the fact—per the nom—that the only source seems to be the very individuals who created the test. — void xor 16:13, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: Subject does not meet the WP:GNG due to a lack of WP:SIGCOV. Let'srun ( talk) 17:28, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.