The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
This is idiotic... This is an article about a one-year old who has been declared the youngest male artist by Guinness because, like any child, he can randomly put paint on a canvas. It seems pretty clear that there will never be sustained coverage of him.
Pichpich (
talk) 20:37, 14 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete: Well, there are a grand total of two news articles in Yen News about the child; we don't hold Guinness Records as notable, so I'm not sure what's left for notability... A child that draws pictures is what every child, everywhere on the planet, does. I don't see notability, at all.
Oaktree b (
talk) 01:10, 15 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete. Perhaps a merge to
Guinness World Records as a brief mention somewhere but other than that, no, Wikipedia does hold individual Guinness Record holders as notable in themselves. -- Ϫ 09:17, 15 May 2024 (UTC)reply
I'm guessing you meant to write: "no, Wikipedia does NOT hold individual Guinness Record holders as notable in themselves"?
Pichpich (
talk) 18:00, 17 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Yes thank you for correcting my error. -- Ϫ 12:43, 18 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete. No need to merge to
Guinness World Records as this is extremely minor based on very few sources over just a short period of time.
Elspea756 (
talk) 12:06, 15 May 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
This is idiotic... This is an article about a one-year old who has been declared the youngest male artist by Guinness because, like any child, he can randomly put paint on a canvas. It seems pretty clear that there will never be sustained coverage of him.
Pichpich (
talk) 20:37, 14 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete: Well, there are a grand total of two news articles in Yen News about the child; we don't hold Guinness Records as notable, so I'm not sure what's left for notability... A child that draws pictures is what every child, everywhere on the planet, does. I don't see notability, at all.
Oaktree b (
talk) 01:10, 15 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete. Perhaps a merge to
Guinness World Records as a brief mention somewhere but other than that, no, Wikipedia does hold individual Guinness Record holders as notable in themselves. -- Ϫ 09:17, 15 May 2024 (UTC)reply
I'm guessing you meant to write: "no, Wikipedia does NOT hold individual Guinness Record holders as notable in themselves"?
Pichpich (
talk) 18:00, 17 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Yes thank you for correcting my error. -- Ϫ 12:43, 18 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete. No need to merge to
Guinness World Records as this is extremely minor based on very few sources over just a short period of time.
Elspea756 (
talk) 12:06, 15 May 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.