The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete per
General notability guideline: "There is no fixed number of sources required since sources vary in quality and depth of coverage, but multiple sources are generally expected." In this case only one source is reliable. The blog,
Tikun Olam, has a mixed record of reliability. It is not possible to base a balanced article on one or two sources writing about a specific aspect, in this case it's relationship with Israeli intelligence.
TFD (
talk)
18:26, 25 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep per notability; I had only added two sources because it was a first edit, but I have just added five other sources that confirm that (as said in the Hebrew Wikipedia version of the article), as of September 2022, it is the Telegram channel with the most views per post in
Israel[1], and stories first published by Abu Ali Express have been often reproduced in the mainstream Israeli media, including in
Maariv,[2]Globes,[3]Ynet,[4]Arutz Sheva,[5] as well as on Israeli television.[6]Dan Palraz (
talk)
13:30, 27 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep per 'In May 2021, during the Israeli-Gaza war, the channel hit a record of 6.7 million views per day, posting many exclusive articles during the fighting, which were then cited by many media outlets.[3]' That shows that it has extraordinary influence. Several sources have since been added. Deletion is not an option because the mediatic angle figures as influential as an instrument of psychological warfare. Merge of course is an option, but I suggest this is the kind of article that has an intrinsic interest, and merits some patience to give the editor time to strengthen its sourcing.
Nishidani (
talk)
21:41, 27 September 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete per
General notability guideline: "There is no fixed number of sources required since sources vary in quality and depth of coverage, but multiple sources are generally expected." In this case only one source is reliable. The blog,
Tikun Olam, has a mixed record of reliability. It is not possible to base a balanced article on one or two sources writing about a specific aspect, in this case it's relationship with Israeli intelligence.
TFD (
talk)
18:26, 25 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep per notability; I had only added two sources because it was a first edit, but I have just added five other sources that confirm that (as said in the Hebrew Wikipedia version of the article), as of September 2022, it is the Telegram channel with the most views per post in
Israel[1], and stories first published by Abu Ali Express have been often reproduced in the mainstream Israeli media, including in
Maariv,[2]Globes,[3]Ynet,[4]Arutz Sheva,[5] as well as on Israeli television.[6]Dan Palraz (
talk)
13:30, 27 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep per 'In May 2021, during the Israeli-Gaza war, the channel hit a record of 6.7 million views per day, posting many exclusive articles during the fighting, which were then cited by many media outlets.[3]' That shows that it has extraordinary influence. Several sources have since been added. Deletion is not an option because the mediatic angle figures as influential as an instrument of psychological warfare. Merge of course is an option, but I suggest this is the kind of article that has an intrinsic interest, and merits some patience to give the editor time to strengthen its sourcing.
Nishidani (
talk)
21:41, 27 September 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.