The result was keep. Non-admin closure. Jujutacular T · C 00:07, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
Lack of notability Supertouch ( talk) 16:27, 24 March 2010 (UTC) reply
Keep Subject is in fact notable as a socio-religious leader, but he is known by the name "kanthapuram". So the article be rather renamed to "Kanthapuram Aboobackar Musliyar". See http://www.kanthapuram.com/eng/details.asp?ID=profile. Note that his followers and he himself prefixes the title "Sheikh", but that is a title and be avoided. Article needs a complete cleanup as it is written in a peacocky fashion Zencv Whisper 22:16, 25 March 2010 (UTC) reply
Keep. As Zencv poined out, the subject is popularly known by the name "Kanthapuram Aboobackar Musliyar" and plenty of reliable sources availabe, such as [1], [2], [3], [4], and [5]. Salih (talk) 09:08, 31 March 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Non-admin closure. Jujutacular T · C 00:07, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
Lack of notability Supertouch ( talk) 16:27, 24 March 2010 (UTC) reply
Keep Subject is in fact notable as a socio-religious leader, but he is known by the name "kanthapuram". So the article be rather renamed to "Kanthapuram Aboobackar Musliyar". See http://www.kanthapuram.com/eng/details.asp?ID=profile. Note that his followers and he himself prefixes the title "Sheikh", but that is a title and be avoided. Article needs a complete cleanup as it is written in a peacocky fashion Zencv Whisper 22:16, 25 March 2010 (UTC) reply
Keep. As Zencv poined out, the subject is popularly known by the name "Kanthapuram Aboobackar Musliyar" and plenty of reliable sources availabe, such as [1], [2], [3], [4], and [5]. Salih (talk) 09:08, 31 March 2010 (UTC) reply