- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Aquagen. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 19:49, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Abgehfaktor ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
not notable, no reviews from reliable sources, no reviews on allmusic or discogs that are cited in the article Artem.G ( talk) 18:44, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Artem.G ( talk) 18:44, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:50, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
- Redirect to Aquagen, no need to deal with this separately from the band. — Kusma ( talk) 20:38, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
- Redirect to Aquagen. For future reference, this is the standard procedure these days for non-notable albums, and in this case it could have been done boldly because the album clearly has no reliable evidence of notability. --- DOOMSDAYER520 ( TALK| CONTRIBS) 01:42, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Aquagen. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 19:49, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Abgehfaktor ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
not notable, no reviews from reliable sources, no reviews on allmusic or discogs that are cited in the article Artem.G ( talk) 18:44, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Artem.G ( talk) 18:44, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:50, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
- Redirect to Aquagen, no need to deal with this separately from the band. — Kusma ( talk) 20:38, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
- Redirect to Aquagen. For future reference, this is the standard procedure these days for non-notable albums, and in this case it could have been done boldly because the album clearly has no reliable evidence of notability. --- DOOMSDAYER520 ( TALK| CONTRIBS) 01:42, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.