The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep Notable scholar per
The Muslim500, a non notable one gets no entry in it.
Muslim 500 profile, a review of his book is there in the 2020 edition of
The Muslim500,
The 500 Most Influential Muslims(PDF) (2020 ed.). Royal Islamic Strategic Studies Centre. p. 124, 235., author of a number of books.
WP:NAUTHOR, 4 (d) says, "been represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums." I argue that the subject's works are permanent collections of
Library of Congress, see
VIAF,
WorldCat which says, "15 works in 25 publications in 2 languages and 141 library holdings". Merely, a subject does not have much online coverage, does not make him non notable. The subject and his works being cited
1,
2. If time permits, I will find out out offline coverage. Thanks -
Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep Notable scholar per
The Muslim500, a non notable one gets no entry in it.
Muslim 500 profile, a review of his book is there in the 2020 edition of
The Muslim500,
The 500 Most Influential Muslims(PDF) (2020 ed.). Royal Islamic Strategic Studies Centre. p. 124, 235., author of a number of books.
WP:NAUTHOR, 4 (d) says, "been represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums." I argue that the subject's works are permanent collections of
Library of Congress, see
VIAF,
WorldCat which says, "15 works in 25 publications in 2 languages and 141 library holdings". Merely, a subject does not have much online coverage, does not make him non notable. The subject and his works being cited
1,
2. If time permits, I will find out out offline coverage. Thanks -
Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.