The result was delete. Particularly per Chris Troutman - sources from the newspaper that the deceased worked for can't be said to be independent. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 02:10, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
I'm somewhat of two minds about this. First of all, it was created by the sock of a very prolific and very disruptive POV editor, and thus there is really no reason to not delete it stante pede per G5; on the other hand, I am loath to just delete articles. However, I do not see much evidence of this subject being notable per GNG, esp. since the best source was written before the monument was built and only spends four short sentences on it. And note that more sock expansion adds nothing that proves notability. Drmies ( talk) 18:28, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Particularly per Chris Troutman - sources from the newspaper that the deceased worked for can't be said to be independent. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 02:10, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
I'm somewhat of two minds about this. First of all, it was created by the sock of a very prolific and very disruptive POV editor, and thus there is really no reason to not delete it stante pede per G5; on the other hand, I am loath to just delete articles. However, I do not see much evidence of this subject being notable per GNG, esp. since the best source was written before the monument was built and only spends four short sentences on it. And note that more sock expansion adds nothing that proves notability. Drmies ( talk) 18:28, 17 October 2017 (UTC)