The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn, no delete !votes standing. The nominator's withdrawal notice seems to be followed by a "but" but as this "but" actually was added in the same edit I'am going to be bold and close ( non-admin closure) Pgallert ( talk) 08:41, 5 October 2010 (UTC) reply
Tiny article (two lines) about a noted documentary artists' much less known documentary. No encylcopedic value, as Wikipedia is not the TV guide. Would not be opposed to a merge with Louis Theroux and/or Coalinga State Hospital, although there is only two lines of content here, so there is little to actually merge. Would object to redirect to Coalinga State Hospital if merge is rejected. Would not be opposed to a redirect to Louis Theroux if merge is rejected. Sven Manguard Talk 16:35, 4 October 2010 (UTC) reply
Note I would like to point out that just because something appeared on TV does not automatically make it notable. In this case the sources he added are reviews (acceptable occasionally) and TV Guide like sites that announce the broadcast and nothing else (not acceptable). I still think that the best solution is the page Louis Theroux's BBC 2 Specials. Sven Manguard Talk 03:03, 5 October 2010 (UTC) reply
____________________
Statement for the record after the official closing of the debate
This statement was placed after the debate was formally closed and is not part of the debate proper. It was added for clarification and historical accuracy purposes only. Please do not remove it.
I am making a statement for the record that contrary to the close rationale, at no time did I withdraw the nomination for AfD I only withdrew the offer to extend the article creator extra time. That being said, the article creator has used the time well and greatly improved the article. It still needs extensive work, but may not qualify as an AfD anymore. As is my existing policy, I am not formally withdrawing the request for deletion, however I will no longer actively fight to have it removed. It works, barely, and that's enough for me to move on.
Sven Manguard
Talk 16:14, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
reply
____________________
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn, no delete !votes standing. The nominator's withdrawal notice seems to be followed by a "but" but as this "but" actually was added in the same edit I'am going to be bold and close ( non-admin closure) Pgallert ( talk) 08:41, 5 October 2010 (UTC) reply
Tiny article (two lines) about a noted documentary artists' much less known documentary. No encylcopedic value, as Wikipedia is not the TV guide. Would not be opposed to a merge with Louis Theroux and/or Coalinga State Hospital, although there is only two lines of content here, so there is little to actually merge. Would object to redirect to Coalinga State Hospital if merge is rejected. Would not be opposed to a redirect to Louis Theroux if merge is rejected. Sven Manguard Talk 16:35, 4 October 2010 (UTC) reply
Note I would like to point out that just because something appeared on TV does not automatically make it notable. In this case the sources he added are reviews (acceptable occasionally) and TV Guide like sites that announce the broadcast and nothing else (not acceptable). I still think that the best solution is the page Louis Theroux's BBC 2 Specials. Sven Manguard Talk 03:03, 5 October 2010 (UTC) reply
____________________
Statement for the record after the official closing of the debate
This statement was placed after the debate was formally closed and is not part of the debate proper. It was added for clarification and historical accuracy purposes only. Please do not remove it.
I am making a statement for the record that contrary to the close rationale, at no time did I withdraw the nomination for AfD I only withdrew the offer to extend the article creator extra time. That being said, the article creator has used the time well and greatly improved the article. It still needs extensive work, but may not qualify as an AfD anymore. As is my existing policy, I am not formally withdrawing the request for deletion, however I will no longer actively fight to have it removed. It works, barely, and that's enough for me to move on.
Sven Manguard
Talk 16:14, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
reply
____________________