The result of the debate was Keep AmiDaniel ( Talk) 04:52, 1 May 2006 (UTC) reply
Relisting as per Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jack_Thompson. Jude ( talk, contribs, email) 06:33, 25 April 2006 (UTC) (no opinion on the matter myself) Following text from the original AFD: reply
I feel the need to defend myself here. This isn't about the so-called WP:NOT policy of censorship, this is about WP:V. The JT article was ripped to shreds and the dicussion following it determined that the likes of GamePolitics.com and GameSpot were not reliable sources and were thus removed. The JT article has no online sources at all now. A Modest Video Game Proposal was entirely online-based, with Thompson issuing his ultimatium through the Internet, the "I'm O.K" guys developing and releasing their game on the Internet, Penny-Arcade (online website) giving the $10,000 check, reporting online, and GameSpot picking up his complaint to the Seattle police department. If isn't allowed in the JT article itself, why should it belong on a sub-article, a fork of the article? Hbdragon88 05:23, 29 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Keep AmiDaniel ( Talk) 04:52, 1 May 2006 (UTC) reply
Relisting as per Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jack_Thompson. Jude ( talk, contribs, email) 06:33, 25 April 2006 (UTC) (no opinion on the matter myself) Following text from the original AFD: reply
I feel the need to defend myself here. This isn't about the so-called WP:NOT policy of censorship, this is about WP:V. The JT article was ripped to shreds and the dicussion following it determined that the likes of GamePolitics.com and GameSpot were not reliable sources and were thus removed. The JT article has no online sources at all now. A Modest Video Game Proposal was entirely online-based, with Thompson issuing his ultimatium through the Internet, the "I'm O.K" guys developing and releasing their game on the Internet, Penny-Arcade (online website) giving the $10,000 check, reporting online, and GameSpot picking up his complaint to the Seattle police department. If isn't allowed in the JT article itself, why should it belong on a sub-article, a fork of the article? Hbdragon88 05:23, 29 April 2006 (UTC) reply