- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Edenbridge (band). Consensus is to again redirect back. ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:28, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
A Livetime in Eden
- A Livetime in Eden ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No sources or indications of meeting either general notability guidelines or specific guidelines for albums. Had been previously redirected to the band article, but has been recreated. ~ ONUnicorn( Talk| Contribs) problem solving 20:25, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
- To be clear; I feel it should once again be redirected, not deleted (i.e. retain history at redirect). However, since it has been recreated once, I want the due process involved in an AFD. ~ ONUnicorn( Talk| Contribs) problem solving 20:26, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 21:37, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
- This album article was being redirected to the band's biography on Wikipedia which had insufficient and little information about the album. ONUnicorn has said that it does not have any sources, if you really read the article you can see the source in the bottom of the article. ~KrypteriaIV 21:56, 9 September 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by KrypteriaIV ( talk • contribs)
- @ KrypteriaIV: It has a section labeled "Sources" with an external link to the band's website. That is not a reliable source. Please look at WP:NALBUMS, which gives the criteria an album should meet in order to have a stand alone article. In order to be kept the article should demonstrate that the album meets one or more of the seven criteria listed there. ~ ONUnicorn( Talk| Contribs) problem solving 16:54, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
- If you check the history of the article you can see that it was not originally redirected to the bands biography, I believe it should be kept as it is right now ~KrypteriaIV 22:02, 9 September 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by KrypteriaIV ( talk • contribs)
- No, it was originally written as a stand alone article very similar to the current iteration. It was redirected because it didn't meet the criteria at WP:NALBUMS, and re-directing to the band is the normal solution for such albums. Above you complained that the band's article has "insufficient and little information about the album." The solution to that is to add information to that article. ~ ONUnicorn( Talk| Contribs) problem solving 16:54, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Austria-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 18:01, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
- Redirect as there's nothing to suggest improvement. SwisterTwister talk 07:36, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
- More sources has been added to meet WP:NALBUMS requierments ~KrypteriaIV 14:56, 14 September 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by KrypteriaIV ( talk • contribs)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 01:07, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 01:07, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 03:18, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 03:18, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
Redirect - as per nom and SwisterTwister. Nothing to show independent notability on the search engines. Onel5969 TT me 02:29, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Edenbridge (band). Consensus is to again redirect back. ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:28, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
A Livetime in Eden
- A Livetime in Eden ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No sources or indications of meeting either general notability guidelines or specific guidelines for albums. Had been previously redirected to the band article, but has been recreated. ~ ONUnicorn( Talk| Contribs) problem solving 20:25, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
- To be clear; I feel it should once again be redirected, not deleted (i.e. retain history at redirect). However, since it has been recreated once, I want the due process involved in an AFD. ~ ONUnicorn( Talk| Contribs) problem solving 20:26, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 21:37, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
- This album article was being redirected to the band's biography on Wikipedia which had insufficient and little information about the album. ONUnicorn has said that it does not have any sources, if you really read the article you can see the source in the bottom of the article. ~KrypteriaIV 21:56, 9 September 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by KrypteriaIV ( talk • contribs)
- @ KrypteriaIV: It has a section labeled "Sources" with an external link to the band's website. That is not a reliable source. Please look at WP:NALBUMS, which gives the criteria an album should meet in order to have a stand alone article. In order to be kept the article should demonstrate that the album meets one or more of the seven criteria listed there. ~ ONUnicorn( Talk| Contribs) problem solving 16:54, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
- If you check the history of the article you can see that it was not originally redirected to the bands biography, I believe it should be kept as it is right now ~KrypteriaIV 22:02, 9 September 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by KrypteriaIV ( talk • contribs)
- No, it was originally written as a stand alone article very similar to the current iteration. It was redirected because it didn't meet the criteria at WP:NALBUMS, and re-directing to the band is the normal solution for such albums. Above you complained that the band's article has "insufficient and little information about the album." The solution to that is to add information to that article. ~ ONUnicorn( Talk| Contribs) problem solving 16:54, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Austria-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 18:01, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
- Redirect as there's nothing to suggest improvement. SwisterTwister talk 07:36, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
- More sources has been added to meet WP:NALBUMS requierments ~KrypteriaIV 14:56, 14 September 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by KrypteriaIV ( talk • contribs)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 01:07, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 01:07, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 03:18, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 03:18, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
Redirect - as per nom and SwisterTwister. Nothing to show independent notability on the search engines. Onel5969 TT me 02:29, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.