- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:33, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
AW Awards
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- AW Awards ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A non-notable pornography industry award. Most of the references are to obvious press releases in industry trade publications; the remainder are to the websites of award recipients or even to Wikipedia articles. Cheers, gnu 57 21:01, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. gnu 57 21:01, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Shellwood ( talk) 21:35, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Delete: (from Discussion: RfC Closed 25 March 2019 Remove.) "significant awards" do not correlate to the subjects meeting WP:BASIC, to which PORNBIO is a supplement. We have WP:ENT and this is sufficient. PORNBIO is gone for good; this does not meet WP:BASIC. Off to the slaughterhouse. -- Whiteguru ( talk) 21:10, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Awards-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:39, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:39, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- Delete: Non-notable award that fails to have WP:SIGCOV. Riteboke ( talk) 08:29, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:33, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
AW Awards
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- AW Awards ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A non-notable pornography industry award. Most of the references are to obvious press releases in industry trade publications; the remainder are to the websites of award recipients or even to Wikipedia articles. Cheers, gnu 57 21:01, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. gnu 57 21:01, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Shellwood ( talk) 21:35, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Delete: (from Discussion: RfC Closed 25 March 2019 Remove.) "significant awards" do not correlate to the subjects meeting WP:BASIC, to which PORNBIO is a supplement. We have WP:ENT and this is sufficient. PORNBIO is gone for good; this does not meet WP:BASIC. Off to the slaughterhouse. -- Whiteguru ( talk) 21:10, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Awards-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:39, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:39, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- Delete: Non-notable award that fails to have WP:SIGCOV. Riteboke ( talk) 08:29, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.