- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. WP:SOFTDELETE given low input Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 15:46, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
ARP-SAPC
- ARP-SAPC ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG. Appears to be promotional. -- David Tornheim ( talk) 09:57, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 21:09, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 21:09, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 21:09, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 21:10, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 21:10, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 06:15, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 06:15, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh ( talk) 15:56, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh ( talk) 15:56, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. WP:SOFTDELETE given low input Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 15:46, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
ARP-SAPC
- ARP-SAPC ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG. Appears to be promotional. -- David Tornheim ( talk) 09:57, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 21:09, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 21:09, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 21:09, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 21:10, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 21:10, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 06:15, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 06:15, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh ( talk) 15:56, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh ( talk) 15:56, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.