- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Consensus NCORP not met Nosebagbear ( talk) 19:23, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
AMS Airlines
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- AMS Airlines ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The airline seems to only have 6 planes, all the sources in the article are trivial, and nothing but trivial coverage for them comes up in a Google search. So they fail WP:NCORP. Adamant1 ( talk) 03:24, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete This airline does fail WP:NCORP because it does not have significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources. In addition, with both Google and Bing searches, nothing of note comes up. Therefore it should be deleted. Stickymatch 23:21, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 03:27, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 03:27, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Georgia (country)-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 03:27, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 17:51, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 17:51, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Very run-of-the-mill airline that lacks notability. TH1980 ( talk) 05:30, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Article in its current form may not be in the best shape, but we normally maintain articles for airlines and should do the same for this one. Epluribusunumyall ( talk) 11:17, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete I am unable to locate any significant coverage with in-depth information on the company and containing independent content, topic therefore fails GNG/ WP:NCORP. HighKing ++ 16:36, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete - The company simply isn't notable. The above arguments make perfect sense. I'm not sure what to say other than that. Deletion is absolutely the right call. CoffeeWithMarkets ( talk) 18:57, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Consensus NCORP not met Nosebagbear ( talk) 19:23, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
AMS Airlines
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- AMS Airlines ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The airline seems to only have 6 planes, all the sources in the article are trivial, and nothing but trivial coverage for them comes up in a Google search. So they fail WP:NCORP. Adamant1 ( talk) 03:24, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete This airline does fail WP:NCORP because it does not have significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources. In addition, with both Google and Bing searches, nothing of note comes up. Therefore it should be deleted. Stickymatch 23:21, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 03:27, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 03:27, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Georgia (country)-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 03:27, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 17:51, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 17:51, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Very run-of-the-mill airline that lacks notability. TH1980 ( talk) 05:30, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Article in its current form may not be in the best shape, but we normally maintain articles for airlines and should do the same for this one. Epluribusunumyall ( talk) 11:17, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete I am unable to locate any significant coverage with in-depth information on the company and containing independent content, topic therefore fails GNG/ WP:NCORP. HighKing ++ 16:36, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete - The company simply isn't notable. The above arguments make perfect sense. I'm not sure what to say other than that. Deletion is absolutely the right call. CoffeeWithMarkets ( talk) 18:57, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.