The result was keep Whether or not the subject meets the notability guidelines and should be mentioned on Wikipedia doesn't appear to be in dispute. However, there does appear to be reasonable arguments for a possible merger, but this is out of the scope of Articles for Deletion. ( non-admin closure) Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 00:40, 19 March 2012 (UTC) reply
I feel it's no more notable than any one of the hundreds of skyscrapers in the city. 99th tallest in Hong Kong is no big deal. No sources Ohconfucius ¡digame! 09:08, 21 February 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was keep Whether or not the subject meets the notability guidelines and should be mentioned on Wikipedia doesn't appear to be in dispute. However, there does appear to be reasonable arguments for a possible merger, but this is out of the scope of Articles for Deletion. ( non-admin closure) Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 00:40, 19 March 2012 (UTC) reply
I feel it's no more notable than any one of the hundreds of skyscrapers in the city. 99th tallest in Hong Kong is no big deal. No sources Ohconfucius ¡digame! 09:08, 21 February 2012 (UTC) reply