- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to BT Broadband. – Juliancolton | Talk 03:48, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- ADSL Max ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NCORP. Has been tagged for failing WP:V for 13 years. My own searching failed to come up with anything significant which wasn't BT marketing literature or related material. Given that this product was apparently retired 5 years ago, it's unlikely that any new sources will appear.
In short, ADSL is certainly notable, but individual product offerings which use the technology are not. -- RoySmith (talk) 23:35, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 03:16, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 03:16, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
- Redirect to Asymmetric digital subscriber line - no evidence of independently meeting WP:GNG, but it should be kept as a redirect to a related topic. -- DannyS712 ( talk) 06:55, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
- Merge and redirect to BT Broadband, as a BT proprietary product, where it is mentioned. I am not in favour of a redirect to a generic article where this product does not merit inclusion. Just Chilling ( talk) 18:17, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to BT Broadband. – Juliancolton | Talk 03:48, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- ADSL Max ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NCORP. Has been tagged for failing WP:V for 13 years. My own searching failed to come up with anything significant which wasn't BT marketing literature or related material. Given that this product was apparently retired 5 years ago, it's unlikely that any new sources will appear.
In short, ADSL is certainly notable, but individual product offerings which use the technology are not. -- RoySmith (talk) 23:35, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 03:16, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 03:16, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
- Redirect to Asymmetric digital subscriber line - no evidence of independently meeting WP:GNG, but it should be kept as a redirect to a related topic. -- DannyS712 ( talk) 06:55, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
- Merge and redirect to BT Broadband, as a BT proprietary product, where it is mentioned. I am not in favour of a redirect to a generic article where this product does not merit inclusion. Just Chilling ( talk) 18:17, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.