 | This discussion was subject to a
deletion review on 2016 January 15. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 12:29, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
- ACE & Company ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Subject of the article fails WP:ORG. I can't find any evidence of notability. Wikic¤l¤gy t@lk to M£ 16:22, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Wikic¤l¤gy t@lk to M£ 16:24, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. Wikic¤l¤gy t@lk to M£ 16:24, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Wikic¤l¤gy t@lk to M£ 16:24, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
- Delete and this AfD entry could have been bundled with those for the pages for the principals in the subject's business. Dkendr ( talk) 16:30, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as mentioned, certainly questionably notable and perhaps not satisfying companies notability guidelines. SwisterTwister talk 06:12, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - nothing in searches to show they pass WP:GNG or WP:NCORP. Onel5969 TT me 12:05, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
| This discussion was subject to a
deletion review on 2016 January 15. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 12:29, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
- ACE & Company ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Subject of the article fails WP:ORG. I can't find any evidence of notability. Wikic¤l¤gy t@lk to M£ 16:22, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Wikic¤l¤gy t@lk to M£ 16:24, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. Wikic¤l¤gy t@lk to M£ 16:24, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Wikic¤l¤gy t@lk to M£ 16:24, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
- Delete and this AfD entry could have been bundled with those for the pages for the principals in the subject's business. Dkendr ( talk) 16:30, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as mentioned, certainly questionably notable and perhaps not satisfying companies notability guidelines. SwisterTwister talk 06:12, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - nothing in searches to show they pass WP:GNG or WP:NCORP. Onel5969 TT me 12:05, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.