The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep – This, quite frankly, is the most ridiculous deletion request I've ever seen. The article was only just created on Friday, and will have more information over the next two months during the buildup to the album release.
Billboard Man (
talk) 13:06, 28 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep as references have been added. The article had just been created (20 minutes before AFD) and coverage already existed in Google News, so this probably
shouldn't have been nominated for deletion.
Peter James (
talk) 09:39, 27 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep – I've heard this group on the radio a lot and if that is true, then this album has importance on Wikipedia.
2601:8C:4001:DCF4:4DB7:8078:579D:9A72 (
talk) 14:16, 27 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Also I give this a speed prodecural close because there now are sources.
73.178.42.174 (
talk) 17:28, 27 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep,
333-blue, I agree with
Peter James, please read
WP:BEFORE the next time you consider taking a 19-minute old article to AfD. The reasons you gave were also invalid, an article having no categories and being short are now viable reasons for deletion? Absurd.
Azealia911talk 22:48, 27 February 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep – This, quite frankly, is the most ridiculous deletion request I've ever seen. The article was only just created on Friday, and will have more information over the next two months during the buildup to the album release.
Billboard Man (
talk) 13:06, 28 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep as references have been added. The article had just been created (20 minutes before AFD) and coverage already existed in Google News, so this probably
shouldn't have been nominated for deletion.
Peter James (
talk) 09:39, 27 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep – I've heard this group on the radio a lot and if that is true, then this album has importance on Wikipedia.
2601:8C:4001:DCF4:4DB7:8078:579D:9A72 (
talk) 14:16, 27 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Also I give this a speed prodecural close because there now are sources.
73.178.42.174 (
talk) 17:28, 27 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep,
333-blue, I agree with
Peter James, please read
WP:BEFORE the next time you consider taking a 19-minute old article to AfD. The reasons you gave were also invalid, an article having no categories and being short are now viable reasons for deletion? Absurd.
Azealia911talk 22:48, 27 February 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.