- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:37, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
4KDownload
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- 4KDownload ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This just looks like spam for a completely non-notable software product, created with the purpose of making it look legitimate/whatever and increasing its search rankings. There is absolutely nothing unique or notable, and actually it's probably just a payware wrapper for youtube-dl or similar open-source project. There are hundreds of commercial shareware wrappers for ffmpeg/whatever and none of them are notable or encyclopedic enough. HomemadePotato ( talk) 06:39, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 09:35, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete: I agree with all the points made above. It looks to me like a legitimization attempt. Zombles - Talk to me 14:02, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Per reasons given in the nomination. The non-primary references it uses are purely promotional and from small sites. - Vipz ( talk) 01:19, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete this text of unabashedly promotional nature. But, mainly, and even so, essentially unsourced. And I counted five SPA curators and more quasi SPAs. Doesn't augur well, this. - The Gnome ( talk) 19:52, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:37, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
4KDownload
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- 4KDownload ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This just looks like spam for a completely non-notable software product, created with the purpose of making it look legitimate/whatever and increasing its search rankings. There is absolutely nothing unique or notable, and actually it's probably just a payware wrapper for youtube-dl or similar open-source project. There are hundreds of commercial shareware wrappers for ffmpeg/whatever and none of them are notable or encyclopedic enough. HomemadePotato ( talk) 06:39, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 09:35, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete: I agree with all the points made above. It looks to me like a legitimization attempt. Zombles - Talk to me 14:02, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Per reasons given in the nomination. The non-primary references it uses are purely promotional and from small sites. - Vipz ( talk) 01:19, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete this text of unabashedly promotional nature. But, mainly, and even so, essentially unsourced. And I counted five SPA curators and more quasi SPAs. Doesn't augur well, this. - The Gnome ( talk) 19:52, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.