- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Anarchyte ( work | talk) 04:06, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
442oons
- 442oons ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG TheMagikCow ( talk) 07:59, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Passes WP:GNG, just needs to be expanded, per these sources: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7], These sources include TalkSport and Metro and all cover the subject in decent detail. I might expand it today. AlessandroTiandelli333 ( talk) 08:16, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Comment Article has now been improved. AlessandroTiandelli333 ( talk) 08:37, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 14:10, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 14:10, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 04:14, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 04:14, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
- Weak keep. It barely squeaks by with the coverage from Gazzette Live and Tube Filter. The other references in the article (particularly the Google search) don't really do anything for notability, in my view. ~ Anachronist ( talk) 06:38, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
- Keep as of sources presented. -- 203.175.67.197 ( talk) 07:55, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
- Weak Keep- sources are borderline, seems a bit WP:TOOSOON. However, it's not particularly objectionable, so I recommend leaving well enough alone. Insert CleverPhrase Here 19:52, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Anarchyte ( work | talk) 04:06, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
442oons
- 442oons ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG TheMagikCow ( talk) 07:59, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Passes WP:GNG, just needs to be expanded, per these sources: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7], These sources include TalkSport and Metro and all cover the subject in decent detail. I might expand it today. AlessandroTiandelli333 ( talk) 08:16, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Comment Article has now been improved. AlessandroTiandelli333 ( talk) 08:37, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 14:10, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 14:10, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 04:14, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 04:14, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
- Weak keep. It barely squeaks by with the coverage from Gazzette Live and Tube Filter. The other references in the article (particularly the Google search) don't really do anything for notability, in my view. ~ Anachronist ( talk) 06:38, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
- Keep as of sources presented. -- 203.175.67.197 ( talk) 07:55, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
- Weak Keep- sources are borderline, seems a bit WP:TOOSOON. However, it's not particularly objectionable, so I recommend leaving well enough alone. Insert CleverPhrase Here 19:52, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.