The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Not able to find reliable, secondary sources meeting WP:GNG. There may be specialist sources, however, although there's already several paragraphs (none of them sourced) at
traffic signal, so I don't believe that a merge, or at least much of one, there is warranted.
j⚛e deckertalk 04:33, 1 June 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete per nomination and failing WP:GNG and WP:VER. Notability on why a specific signal should merit its own stand-alone article not established. BlueRiband► 12:11, 1 June 2014 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
NorthAmerica1000 08:47, 11 June 2014 (UTC)reply
Go ahead and delete - There doesn't seem to be enough for a detailed article, with
this being the only result I've found.
SwisterTwistertalk 21:27, 12 June 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Not able to find reliable, secondary sources meeting WP:GNG. There may be specialist sources, however, although there's already several paragraphs (none of them sourced) at
traffic signal, so I don't believe that a merge, or at least much of one, there is warranted.
j⚛e deckertalk 04:33, 1 June 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete per nomination and failing WP:GNG and WP:VER. Notability on why a specific signal should merit its own stand-alone article not established. BlueRiband► 12:11, 1 June 2014 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
NorthAmerica1000 08:47, 11 June 2014 (UTC)reply
Go ahead and delete - There doesn't seem to be enough for a detailed article, with
this being the only result I've found.
SwisterTwistertalk 21:27, 12 June 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.