From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. — Tom Morris ( talk) 13:37, 9 August 2014 (UTC) reply

300 North Meridian

300 North Meridian (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This building seems to fail WP:GNG, unless someone is able to dredge up some useful information from offline news sources. Apart from the fact it exists, there's nothing in the article here to warrant a Wikipedia profile. Even when it was built it would have been only the fourth tallest building in the city. I can only find mentions online as being a business address for a variety of companies. Sionk ( talk) 06:05, 2 August 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indiana-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 11:03, 2 August 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 11:03, 2 August 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Comment The two sources ( [1] [2]) show this building has some architectural importance. If it was built in 1939, I would say keep. As the fifth tallest building in a large city, I think there might be multiple reliable sources about it (just as Jin_Mao_Tower), but I can't find them. Not sure if it passes WP:GEOFEAT. Anyway, redirect to List_of_tallest_buildings_in_Indianapolis does no harm.-- 180.172.239.231 ( talk) 12:23, 2 August 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Keep I added one of the IP's sources along with some others to the article and that demonstrates notability. The Indiana State Library also has records of two offline articles whose titles indicate significant coverage of the subject ( [3] [4]). Altamel ( talk) 18:51, 4 August 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Nomination withdrawn, now Altamel has done a very good job of uncovering sources and claims of notability. Sionk ( talk) 21:24, 4 August 2014 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. — Tom Morris ( talk) 13:37, 9 August 2014 (UTC) reply

300 North Meridian

300 North Meridian (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This building seems to fail WP:GNG, unless someone is able to dredge up some useful information from offline news sources. Apart from the fact it exists, there's nothing in the article here to warrant a Wikipedia profile. Even when it was built it would have been only the fourth tallest building in the city. I can only find mentions online as being a business address for a variety of companies. Sionk ( talk) 06:05, 2 August 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indiana-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 11:03, 2 August 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 11:03, 2 August 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Comment The two sources ( [1] [2]) show this building has some architectural importance. If it was built in 1939, I would say keep. As the fifth tallest building in a large city, I think there might be multiple reliable sources about it (just as Jin_Mao_Tower), but I can't find them. Not sure if it passes WP:GEOFEAT. Anyway, redirect to List_of_tallest_buildings_in_Indianapolis does no harm.-- 180.172.239.231 ( talk) 12:23, 2 August 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Keep I added one of the IP's sources along with some others to the article and that demonstrates notability. The Indiana State Library also has records of two offline articles whose titles indicate significant coverage of the subject ( [3] [4]). Altamel ( talk) 18:51, 4 August 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Nomination withdrawn, now Altamel has done a very good job of uncovering sources and claims of notability. Sionk ( talk) 21:24, 4 August 2014 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook