The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
This building seems to fail
WP:GNG, unless someone is able to dredge up some useful information from offline news sources. Apart from the fact it exists, there's nothing in the article here to warrant a Wikipedia profile. Even when it was built it would have been only the fourth tallest building in the city. I can only find mentions online as being a business address for a variety of companies.
Sionk (
talk) 06:05, 2 August 2014 (UTC)reply
Comment The two sources (
[1][2]) show this building has some architectural importance. If it was built in 1939, I would say keep. As the fifth tallest building in a large city, I think there might be multiple reliable sources about it (just as
Jin_Mao_Tower), but I can't find them. Not sure if it passes
WP:GEOFEAT. Anyway, redirect to
List_of_tallest_buildings_in_Indianapolis does no harm.--
180.172.239.231 (
talk) 12:23, 2 August 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep I added one of the IP's sources along with some others to the article and that demonstrates notability. The Indiana State Library also has records of two offline articles whose titles indicate significant coverage of the subject (
[3][4]).
Altamel (
talk) 18:51, 4 August 2014 (UTC)reply
Nomination withdrawn, now
Altamel has done a very good job of uncovering sources and claims of notability.
Sionk (
talk) 21:24, 4 August 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
This building seems to fail
WP:GNG, unless someone is able to dredge up some useful information from offline news sources. Apart from the fact it exists, there's nothing in the article here to warrant a Wikipedia profile. Even when it was built it would have been only the fourth tallest building in the city. I can only find mentions online as being a business address for a variety of companies.
Sionk (
talk) 06:05, 2 August 2014 (UTC)reply
Comment The two sources (
[1][2]) show this building has some architectural importance. If it was built in 1939, I would say keep. As the fifth tallest building in a large city, I think there might be multiple reliable sources about it (just as
Jin_Mao_Tower), but I can't find them. Not sure if it passes
WP:GEOFEAT. Anyway, redirect to
List_of_tallest_buildings_in_Indianapolis does no harm.--
180.172.239.231 (
talk) 12:23, 2 August 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep I added one of the IP's sources along with some others to the article and that demonstrates notability. The Indiana State Library also has records of two offline articles whose titles indicate significant coverage of the subject (
[3][4]).
Altamel (
talk) 18:51, 4 August 2014 (UTC)reply
Nomination withdrawn, now
Altamel has done a very good job of uncovering sources and claims of notability.
Sionk (
talk) 21:24, 4 August 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.