The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedily deleted per
CSD G11 by
Athaenara. Non-admin closure.
Gr1st (
talk) 11:24, 25 August 2008 (UTC)reply
Web checkout company that seems to fail
WP:ORG due to no coverage in independent reliable sources. Parts of it are written like an advertisement, and the bits that aren't are unsourced weasel-worded criticism. Doesn't seem to be any sourceable encyclopedic content. ~
mazcat |
c 21:58, 24 August 2008 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedily deleted per
CSD G11 by
Athaenara. Non-admin closure.
Gr1st (
talk) 11:24, 25 August 2008 (UTC)reply
Web checkout company that seems to fail
WP:ORG due to no coverage in independent reliable sources. Parts of it are written like an advertisement, and the bits that aren't are unsourced weasel-worded criticism. Doesn't seem to be any sourceable encyclopedic content. ~
mazcat |
c 21:58, 24 August 2008 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.