The result was keep. Passes notability guidelines for objects ( non-admin closure) Kevin Rutherford ( talk) 21:14, 2 April 2013 (UTC) reply
While this may be funny, I don't believe that it meets WP:NASTRO. It has never been naked-eye visible, is not in any notable catalogue, has not had any significant coverage (outside of WP), and was not discovered before 1850. Therefore, it fails all WP:NASTRO criteria, and should not be here. StringTheory11 ( t • c) 03:52, 2 April 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Passes notability guidelines for objects ( non-admin closure) Kevin Rutherford ( talk) 21:14, 2 April 2013 (UTC) reply
While this may be funny, I don't believe that it meets WP:NASTRO. It has never been naked-eye visible, is not in any notable catalogue, has not had any significant coverage (outside of WP), and was not discovered before 1850. Therefore, it fails all WP:NASTRO criteria, and should not be here. StringTheory11 ( t • c) 03:52, 2 April 2013 (UTC) reply