- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 13:30, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
- 250 West 90th Street ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
There is nothing notable about this building or interesting about this article. This is just a random NYC apartment building. It does not appear to meet the Notability criteria for having its own Wikipedia article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.239.30.32 ( talk) 21:30, 18 November 2017
- Discussion page created on behalf of IP User:96.239.30.32 as requested here. -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 22:13, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
- Comment. As with past cases, I object to AFD editors paying any attention at all to this AFD nomination where it appears no editor takes responsibility. User:Malcolmxl5, will you stand by this nomination? Have you or will you perform wp:BEFORE and develop the article with sources, instead of foisting it upon others? You do others a disservice by this AFD as it appears now, if you do not step up. There is a reason that I.P. editors are not allowed to create AFDs.
- I would support a general policy proposal to summarily dismiss AFDs like this. --
do
ncr
am
14:05, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
- Concur wit DonCram. E.M.Gregory ( talk) 21:11, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Sure looks like a WP:Mill building to me. Searching turns up a plethora of real estate listings of condos for sale. I did find this [1] directory-type listing which could be used to verify basic facts but does nothing for notability The only book mention I found is [2] which is sourced from WP! MB 16:52, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter123 (orate) 21:14, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter123 (orate) 21:14, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. No evidence of significant coverage in reliable sources. Pburka ( talk) 22:05, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CThomas3 ( talk) 19:18, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 13:30, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 13:30, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Morphenniel ( talk) 18:39, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete This article pretty much exactly fits WP:ROTM and has no path to notability. Operator873 CONNECT 04:08, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 13:30, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
- 250 West 90th Street ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
There is nothing notable about this building or interesting about this article. This is just a random NYC apartment building. It does not appear to meet the Notability criteria for having its own Wikipedia article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.239.30.32 ( talk) 21:30, 18 November 2017
- Discussion page created on behalf of IP User:96.239.30.32 as requested here. -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 22:13, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
- Comment. As with past cases, I object to AFD editors paying any attention at all to this AFD nomination where it appears no editor takes responsibility. User:Malcolmxl5, will you stand by this nomination? Have you or will you perform wp:BEFORE and develop the article with sources, instead of foisting it upon others? You do others a disservice by this AFD as it appears now, if you do not step up. There is a reason that I.P. editors are not allowed to create AFDs.
- I would support a general policy proposal to summarily dismiss AFDs like this. --
do
ncr
am
14:05, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
- Concur wit DonCram. E.M.Gregory ( talk) 21:11, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Sure looks like a WP:Mill building to me. Searching turns up a plethora of real estate listings of condos for sale. I did find this [1] directory-type listing which could be used to verify basic facts but does nothing for notability The only book mention I found is [2] which is sourced from WP! MB 16:52, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter123 (orate) 21:14, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter123 (orate) 21:14, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. No evidence of significant coverage in reliable sources. Pburka ( talk) 22:05, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CThomas3 ( talk) 19:18, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 13:30, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 13:30, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Morphenniel ( talk) 18:39, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete This article pretty much exactly fits WP:ROTM and has no path to notability. Operator873 CONNECT 04:08, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.