The result was speedy keep. Nomination is withdrawn and no support for Delete. Liz Read! Talk! 01:35, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
WP:NOT. The article currently only contains unreliable and/or non-independent references. When researching this topic I could not find any sufficiently reliable or independent references to improve the article with. I would recommend redirecting to 20Q (game show), but that article may very well have the same problem (I have not looked into it). Mokadoshi ( talk) 16:55, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Comment Nice, I remember this toy. I'll take a look at what sourcing is out there before chiming in on the deletion discussion, but agree a merge is sound if the article lacks notability. VRXCES ( talk) 20:55, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Keep The toy is notable. There is announcement and release information about the toy ( [1] [2]) and some significant coverage ( [3] [4] [5] [6]). The website suggests there are some inaccessible sources ( [7]) and awards ( [8]) - see WP:NEXIST. Given that the Toys WikiProject is a bit dead, and there's no formal notability guidance, I think the fact there's a specific product that recieved coverage and recognition in reliable sources for its novelty and received industry awards is enough for me. The game is a combination of an artificial intelligence prototype, website, then toy; the article could theoretically merge these and further cement notability if the notability of the toy alone was in doubt. The LLM/AI angle is interesting and there seems to be a source or two on Google Scholar about this. On the WP:BEFORE debate above - look, it's inconvenient when key sources are missed, but it happens. It's no big deal, especially when the sources are ultimately found. VRXCES ( talk) 04:56, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Discussion of the sources presented could be helpful.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
IgnatiusofLondon (
talk)
01:04, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Comment The 20Q website, toy and quiz show are all just implementions of twenty questions, the real question is merge with twenty questions or kept split as overall the twenty questions concept is notable as a whole and there have been other quiz shows with the same formula. 77.103.193.166 ( talk) 14:45, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: still waiting on discussion of sources
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
78.26 (
spin me /
revolutions)
02:01, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nomination is withdrawn and no support for Delete. Liz Read! Talk! 01:35, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
WP:NOT. The article currently only contains unreliable and/or non-independent references. When researching this topic I could not find any sufficiently reliable or independent references to improve the article with. I would recommend redirecting to 20Q (game show), but that article may very well have the same problem (I have not looked into it). Mokadoshi ( talk) 16:55, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Comment Nice, I remember this toy. I'll take a look at what sourcing is out there before chiming in on the deletion discussion, but agree a merge is sound if the article lacks notability. VRXCES ( talk) 20:55, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Keep The toy is notable. There is announcement and release information about the toy ( [1] [2]) and some significant coverage ( [3] [4] [5] [6]). The website suggests there are some inaccessible sources ( [7]) and awards ( [8]) - see WP:NEXIST. Given that the Toys WikiProject is a bit dead, and there's no formal notability guidance, I think the fact there's a specific product that recieved coverage and recognition in reliable sources for its novelty and received industry awards is enough for me. The game is a combination of an artificial intelligence prototype, website, then toy; the article could theoretically merge these and further cement notability if the notability of the toy alone was in doubt. The LLM/AI angle is interesting and there seems to be a source or two on Google Scholar about this. On the WP:BEFORE debate above - look, it's inconvenient when key sources are missed, but it happens. It's no big deal, especially when the sources are ultimately found. VRXCES ( talk) 04:56, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Discussion of the sources presented could be helpful.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
IgnatiusofLondon (
talk)
01:04, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Comment The 20Q website, toy and quiz show are all just implementions of twenty questions, the real question is merge with twenty questions or kept split as overall the twenty questions concept is notable as a whole and there have been other quiz shows with the same formula. 77.103.193.166 ( talk) 14:45, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: still waiting on discussion of sources
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
78.26 (
spin me /
revolutions)
02:01, 28 February 2024 (UTC)