- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. It clearly makes no sense to have just one redlinked year in this century. Merging is a more viable option, but I don't see a clear consensus for this, either. Taking off my admin cap for a moment and just speaking as an editor, I would have to guess that there are probably plenty of noteworthy predicted or fictional events during 2098 that simply haven't been added yet. – Juliancolton | Talk 18:29, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
2098
- 2098 ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No sourced events at all, and WP:CRYSTAL. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk, contribs) 16:40, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Comment: Does not go against WP:CRYSTAL as it does not yet predict any events. RoCo (talk) 16:45, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 17:27, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Merge to 2090s, but only if all of 2090 through 2099 are merged. Deletion is completely inappropriate, even if there is (or was) nothing that should be here. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 06:49, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
- Wikipedia: WikiProject Years has been notified. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 07:04, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:NotJustYet. TheDracologist ( talk) 00:49, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 08:50, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 08:50, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
- Delete / Merge Per WP:TOOSOON. Nothing to say yet nor will there be for some time. AusLondonder ( talk) 06:08, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Delete/Merge?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades Godric 04:37, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
Relisting comment: Delete/Merge?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades Godric 04:37, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
- Keep, I added a reference to the article. Wayne Elgin ( talk) 04:14, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. Not even worth merging. Ifnord ( talk) 16:25, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
- Merge and delete per WP:CRYSTAL. Luis150902 ( talk | contribs) 17:43, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
- Keep or Merge per User: Arthur Rubin. Deleting would be totally inappropriate. RoCo (talk) 17:49, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. It clearly makes no sense to have just one redlinked year in this century. Merging is a more viable option, but I don't see a clear consensus for this, either. Taking off my admin cap for a moment and just speaking as an editor, I would have to guess that there are probably plenty of noteworthy predicted or fictional events during 2098 that simply haven't been added yet. – Juliancolton | Talk 18:29, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
2098
- 2098 ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No sourced events at all, and WP:CRYSTAL. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk, contribs) 16:40, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Comment: Does not go against WP:CRYSTAL as it does not yet predict any events. RoCo (talk) 16:45, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 17:27, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Merge to 2090s, but only if all of 2090 through 2099 are merged. Deletion is completely inappropriate, even if there is (or was) nothing that should be here. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 06:49, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
- Wikipedia: WikiProject Years has been notified. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 07:04, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:NotJustYet. TheDracologist ( talk) 00:49, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 08:50, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 08:50, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
- Delete / Merge Per WP:TOOSOON. Nothing to say yet nor will there be for some time. AusLondonder ( talk) 06:08, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Delete/Merge?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades Godric 04:37, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
Relisting comment: Delete/Merge?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades Godric 04:37, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
- Keep, I added a reference to the article. Wayne Elgin ( talk) 04:14, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. Not even worth merging. Ifnord ( talk) 16:25, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
- Merge and delete per WP:CRYSTAL. Luis150902 ( talk | contribs) 17:43, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
- Keep or Merge per User: Arthur Rubin. Deleting would be totally inappropriate. RoCo (talk) 17:49, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.