- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 00:29, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- 2026 NCAA Division I Indoor Track and Field Championships ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Seems to be TOO SOON for this article to exist. I therefore propose deletion, or to possibly redirect somewhere if a plausible target is found. CycloneYoris talk! 22:32, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports and Arkansas. CycloneYoris talk! 22:32, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
- Redirect to NCAA Division I Men's Indoor Track and Field Championships and do not draftify. Way WP:TOOSOON for an article on an event which has no coverage outside of a single WP:PRIMARY routine announcement of date and venue. This can easily be covered on the chart of championships listed in the proposed target article. I oppose a move to draft space because it is highly unlikely any significant coverage will be available until January 2026 at the earliest (the start of that year’s indoor track season), meaning there is no benefit to creating a draft at this time. Frank Anchor 00:22, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and Sport of athletics. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:22, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
- Redirect per Frank Anchor. It is probably too early for the 2025 article; this one is definitely too soon. I could probably be convinced it is too soon for even a redirect. Walsh90210 ( talk) 02:02, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete way too soon, and not mentioned at parent article, and so redirect is inappropriate. I also oppose moving to draft space, since it's about 21 months until the event and draft space is not an indefinite holding area. Joseph 2302 ( talk) 07:05, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- Adding a mention at the parent article is an easily WP:SURMOUNTABLE problem. A section with future locations can be added after the list of past events. Frank Anchor 00:53, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete The topic doesn't seem to match WP:SPORTSEVENT. It clearly states that student competitions are not considered noteworthy, and the article itself about the sporting event should not be just a collection of statistics. When the event is held and something significant happens there, then maybe it will become an acceptable candidate for an article-- Saul McGill ( talk) 14:41, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:19, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: Far too soon to have notability. A futurist date where anything can happen before we get there. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Not opposed (2nd choice) to a Redirect per Frank Anchor -- Otr500 ( talk) 04:31, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 00:29, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- 2026 NCAA Division I Indoor Track and Field Championships ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Seems to be TOO SOON for this article to exist. I therefore propose deletion, or to possibly redirect somewhere if a plausible target is found. CycloneYoris talk! 22:32, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports and Arkansas. CycloneYoris talk! 22:32, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
- Redirect to NCAA Division I Men's Indoor Track and Field Championships and do not draftify. Way WP:TOOSOON for an article on an event which has no coverage outside of a single WP:PRIMARY routine announcement of date and venue. This can easily be covered on the chart of championships listed in the proposed target article. I oppose a move to draft space because it is highly unlikely any significant coverage will be available until January 2026 at the earliest (the start of that year’s indoor track season), meaning there is no benefit to creating a draft at this time. Frank Anchor 00:22, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and Sport of athletics. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:22, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
- Redirect per Frank Anchor. It is probably too early for the 2025 article; this one is definitely too soon. I could probably be convinced it is too soon for even a redirect. Walsh90210 ( talk) 02:02, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete way too soon, and not mentioned at parent article, and so redirect is inappropriate. I also oppose moving to draft space, since it's about 21 months until the event and draft space is not an indefinite holding area. Joseph 2302 ( talk) 07:05, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- Adding a mention at the parent article is an easily WP:SURMOUNTABLE problem. A section with future locations can be added after the list of past events. Frank Anchor 00:53, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete The topic doesn't seem to match WP:SPORTSEVENT. It clearly states that student competitions are not considered noteworthy, and the article itself about the sporting event should not be just a collection of statistics. When the event is held and something significant happens there, then maybe it will become an acceptable candidate for an article-- Saul McGill ( talk) 14:41, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:19, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: Far too soon to have notability. A futurist date where anything can happen before we get there. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Not opposed (2nd choice) to a Redirect per Frank Anchor -- Otr500 ( talk) 04:31, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.