The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Irrelevant
WP:CONTENTFORK from
2023 Cricket World Cup, which doesn't add any encyclopedic value about the event itself. The section on COVID is mentioned in the 2023 CWC article, the Asia Cup stuff is mentioned there and is not directly relevant to the CWC itself, the teamwise backgrounds are irrelevant and the ICC Tournaments aren't crucial to a reader's understanding of this CWC either. All in all, not needed.
Joseph2302 (
talk)
09:25, 7 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom; unnecessary content fork. If the parent article is too unwieldy there are better ways this information can be split off.
Harrias(he/him) •talk09:35, 7 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete. Unnecessary, largely non-encyclopedic, content fork; a fan essay riddled with NPOV and OR issues. A (very) brief summary in the main article would cover all encyclopedic content that isn't already there. wjematherplease leave a message...10:04, 7 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete Per nom and others. Unnecessary content fork, and anything of interest in here can be merged to relevant articles already in existence on the subject.
Rugbyfan22 (
talk)
20:07, 7 November 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Irrelevant
WP:CONTENTFORK from
2023 Cricket World Cup, which doesn't add any encyclopedic value about the event itself. The section on COVID is mentioned in the 2023 CWC article, the Asia Cup stuff is mentioned there and is not directly relevant to the CWC itself, the teamwise backgrounds are irrelevant and the ICC Tournaments aren't crucial to a reader's understanding of this CWC either. All in all, not needed.
Joseph2302 (
talk)
09:25, 7 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom; unnecessary content fork. If the parent article is too unwieldy there are better ways this information can be split off.
Harrias(he/him) •talk09:35, 7 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete. Unnecessary, largely non-encyclopedic, content fork; a fan essay riddled with NPOV and OR issues. A (very) brief summary in the main article would cover all encyclopedic content that isn't already there. wjematherplease leave a message...10:04, 7 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete Per nom and others. Unnecessary content fork, and anything of interest in here can be merged to relevant articles already in existence on the subject.
Rugbyfan22 (
talk)
20:07, 7 November 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.