The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Was draftified in hopes of improvement. Was returned to mainspace without a single in-depth source. Waited several weeks to see if there was going to be any effort to improve the article, and then after the election was weeks in the past, redirected to the council page, which was immediately reverted without improvement. Another week has gone by, and still not a single in-depth source. Currently fails
WP:GNG.
Onel5969TT me12:01, 26 May 2023 (UTC)reply
The source is the council's own website. Unfortunately the format of that website does not allow in to do it by individual ward, instead displaying dynamically
Keep Have now added media coverage demonstrating notability and reliable secondary sources in addition to the primary source of the council's formal declaration of results. Have also added narrative summary for context.
Stortford (
talk)
21:46, 3 June 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep per Number57; there is enough RS that covered this election (which should be added to the article) to make it notable.
Aszx5000 (
talk)
15:49, 3 June 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Was draftified in hopes of improvement. Was returned to mainspace without a single in-depth source. Waited several weeks to see if there was going to be any effort to improve the article, and then after the election was weeks in the past, redirected to the council page, which was immediately reverted without improvement. Another week has gone by, and still not a single in-depth source. Currently fails
WP:GNG.
Onel5969TT me12:01, 26 May 2023 (UTC)reply
The source is the council's own website. Unfortunately the format of that website does not allow in to do it by individual ward, instead displaying dynamically
Keep Have now added media coverage demonstrating notability and reliable secondary sources in addition to the primary source of the council's formal declaration of results. Have also added narrative summary for context.
Stortford (
talk)
21:46, 3 June 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep per Number57; there is enough RS that covered this election (which should be added to the article) to make it notable.
Aszx5000 (
talk)
15:49, 3 June 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.