The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The keep votes are not convincing while those requesting delete are providing clear policy based reasons.
Dennis Brown -
2¢18:55, 23 July 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete fails
WP:GNG and
WP:NLIST, the article itself is just links to loads of random, mostly non-notable events. We don't have qualifying articles for the national championships of sports in any other country, because they don't pass
WP:GNG generally, and this is no exception. Also, seems like
WP:FANCRUFT to me, as the topic is too niche.
Joseph2302 (
talk)
08:00, 13 July 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep The article is not a stand-alone list, so it doesn't need to meet
WP:NLIST standards. For
WP:GNG, it meets Significant coverage with both the article & the sources describe the qualification criterion directly and in detail; Reliable sources as the information is taken from Japan Gymnastics Association, the one that organized the events, & Seiko Sportslink, a popular sport website in Japan; secondary source & independent of the subject as Seiko Sportslink belongs to Seiko Corporation & isn't affiliated with gymnastics organizations in Japan.
NguyenDuyAnh1995 (
talk)
09:32, 13 July 2022 (UTC)reply
All the sources listed are results tables- they show the event happened, but are not significant coverage about the event. Significant coverage would be prose in e.g. newspapers/websites about the qualification event.
Joseph2302 (
talk)
09:44, 13 July 2022 (UTC)reply
Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention, but it does not need to be the main topic of the source material, as stated at
WP:GNG with no mention of "prose". The source cited the criterion, as it is in criterion topic, & the detailed results, another topic, of each event are in another link. All are directly & in detailed to the topics each of them is related to.
NguyenDuyAnh1995 (
talk)
10:13, 13 July 2022 (UTC)reply
I can add the events that were served as the qualifications in references. But the website is in maintenance & will be available in a week or two.
NguyenDuyAnh1995 (
talk)
10:22, 13 July 2022 (UTC)reply
And lists of events/results is not significant coverage, and so none of the current sources in the article are significant coverage.
Joseph2302 (
talk)
09:56, 19 July 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete Fails
WP:GNG. No notable events within the article. Also, are some of the accounts in this discussion linked because the IP account looks suspicious with this being it’s only edit.
Fats40boy11 (
talk)
08:01, 21 July 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The keep votes are not convincing while those requesting delete are providing clear policy based reasons.
Dennis Brown -
2¢18:55, 23 July 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete fails
WP:GNG and
WP:NLIST, the article itself is just links to loads of random, mostly non-notable events. We don't have qualifying articles for the national championships of sports in any other country, because they don't pass
WP:GNG generally, and this is no exception. Also, seems like
WP:FANCRUFT to me, as the topic is too niche.
Joseph2302 (
talk)
08:00, 13 July 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep The article is not a stand-alone list, so it doesn't need to meet
WP:NLIST standards. For
WP:GNG, it meets Significant coverage with both the article & the sources describe the qualification criterion directly and in detail; Reliable sources as the information is taken from Japan Gymnastics Association, the one that organized the events, & Seiko Sportslink, a popular sport website in Japan; secondary source & independent of the subject as Seiko Sportslink belongs to Seiko Corporation & isn't affiliated with gymnastics organizations in Japan.
NguyenDuyAnh1995 (
talk)
09:32, 13 July 2022 (UTC)reply
All the sources listed are results tables- they show the event happened, but are not significant coverage about the event. Significant coverage would be prose in e.g. newspapers/websites about the qualification event.
Joseph2302 (
talk)
09:44, 13 July 2022 (UTC)reply
Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention, but it does not need to be the main topic of the source material, as stated at
WP:GNG with no mention of "prose". The source cited the criterion, as it is in criterion topic, & the detailed results, another topic, of each event are in another link. All are directly & in detailed to the topics each of them is related to.
NguyenDuyAnh1995 (
talk)
10:13, 13 July 2022 (UTC)reply
I can add the events that were served as the qualifications in references. But the website is in maintenance & will be available in a week or two.
NguyenDuyAnh1995 (
talk)
10:22, 13 July 2022 (UTC)reply
And lists of events/results is not significant coverage, and so none of the current sources in the article are significant coverage.
Joseph2302 (
talk)
09:56, 19 July 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete Fails
WP:GNG. No notable events within the article. Also, are some of the accounts in this discussion linked because the IP account looks suspicious with this being it’s only edit.
Fats40boy11 (
talk)
08:01, 21 July 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.