From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. The existence of multiple reliable sources does not mean that an article passes WP:NOTNEWS. Noone suggesting keep has provided any other argument of why WP:NOTNEWS should not apply in this case. Pax:Vobiscum ( talk) 15:17, 17 May 2023 (UTC) reply

2022 Al-Sabboura bus bombing (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTNEWS one of the many instances of bombings, airstrikes or clashes during the low intensity period of Syrian war. Ecrusized ( talk) 13:28, 21 April 2023 (UTC) reply

Keep. It needs more sourcing and writing, but there are numerous sources talking about the attack. Jebiguess ( talk) 13:18, 24 April 2023 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 14:38, 28 April 2023 (UTC) reply

Weak keep Meets WP:GNG. WP:NOTNEWS is a concern, but I think it has enough lasting impact to warrant an article. QuicoleJR ( talk) 23:06, 28 April 2023 (UTC) reply

QuicoleJR, what would that lasting impact be? My sense at the moment is not notable enough, compared to all the other similar incidents we don't have articles on, but if there is genuine long-term impact that would warrant an article. BobFromBrockley ( talk) 11:26, 3 May 2023 (UTC) reply
Looking again, I have to say, it really isn't lasting or notable. Weak delete, but if lasting effect can be found, I will go back to voting keep. QuicoleJR ( talk) 13:17, 3 May 2023 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Arbitrarily0 ( talk) 20:38, 6 May 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. The existence of multiple reliable sources does not mean that an article passes WP:NOTNEWS. Noone suggesting keep has provided any other argument of why WP:NOTNEWS should not apply in this case. Pax:Vobiscum ( talk) 15:17, 17 May 2023 (UTC) reply

2022 Al-Sabboura bus bombing (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTNEWS one of the many instances of bombings, airstrikes or clashes during the low intensity period of Syrian war. Ecrusized ( talk) 13:28, 21 April 2023 (UTC) reply

Keep. It needs more sourcing and writing, but there are numerous sources talking about the attack. Jebiguess ( talk) 13:18, 24 April 2023 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 14:38, 28 April 2023 (UTC) reply

Weak keep Meets WP:GNG. WP:NOTNEWS is a concern, but I think it has enough lasting impact to warrant an article. QuicoleJR ( talk) 23:06, 28 April 2023 (UTC) reply

QuicoleJR, what would that lasting impact be? My sense at the moment is not notable enough, compared to all the other similar incidents we don't have articles on, but if there is genuine long-term impact that would warrant an article. BobFromBrockley ( talk) 11:26, 3 May 2023 (UTC) reply
Looking again, I have to say, it really isn't lasting or notable. Weak delete, but if lasting effect can be found, I will go back to voting keep. QuicoleJR ( talk) 13:17, 3 May 2023 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Arbitrarily0 ( talk) 20:38, 6 May 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook