The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep.
Daniel (
talk) 11:05, 7 March 2021 (UTC)reply
Fails WP:LASTING, WP:INDEPTH, WP:EVENTCRIT - "Routine kinds of news events (including most crimes, accidents, deaths, celebrity or political news, "shock" news, stories lacking lasting value such as "water cooler stories," and viral phenomena) – whether or not tragic or widely reported at the time – are usually not notable unless something further gives them additional enduring significance." //
Timothy ::
talk 07:25, 28 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Reply: The article is about Europe, it mentions Beijing in the last sentence, but the source is about Europe, so there is nothing to merge. Someone can certainly add the above to the Beijing article, but again nothing here to merge. //
Timothy ::
talk 16:27, 28 February 2021 (UTC)reply
It's because the record winter temperatures in Beijing are notable, routinely high winter temperatures in Europe are not (per nom).
SailingInABathTub (
talk) 16:40, 28 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Reply:: The article has been updated and based on sources found, it also includes South Korea's town Pahong reaching 24.9 °C (76.8 °F) on February 21st. The previous known record of high winter temperature was 24.5 °C (76.1 °F).
Keep, changing vote following article revision. This weather event is notable because it resulted in several new temperature records across a wide area.
SailingInABathTub (
talk) 17:28, 28 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Keep, Considered notable agreeing to
this users fact. We'll see what else can be considered to keep this article according to wikipedia's standards.
AustroHungarian1867 (
AustroHungarian1867) 4:50, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
Reply So which news website is considered acceptable?
AustroHungarian1867 (
talk) 4:29, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Keep, given that this event set numerous heat records across two continents, I think it has a good chance of passing
WP:10YT.
Devonian Wombat (
talk) 09:41, 2 March 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep.
Daniel (
talk) 11:05, 7 March 2021 (UTC)reply
Fails WP:LASTING, WP:INDEPTH, WP:EVENTCRIT - "Routine kinds of news events (including most crimes, accidents, deaths, celebrity or political news, "shock" news, stories lacking lasting value such as "water cooler stories," and viral phenomena) – whether or not tragic or widely reported at the time – are usually not notable unless something further gives them additional enduring significance." //
Timothy ::
talk 07:25, 28 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Reply: The article is about Europe, it mentions Beijing in the last sentence, but the source is about Europe, so there is nothing to merge. Someone can certainly add the above to the Beijing article, but again nothing here to merge. //
Timothy ::
talk 16:27, 28 February 2021 (UTC)reply
It's because the record winter temperatures in Beijing are notable, routinely high winter temperatures in Europe are not (per nom).
SailingInABathTub (
talk) 16:40, 28 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Reply:: The article has been updated and based on sources found, it also includes South Korea's town Pahong reaching 24.9 °C (76.8 °F) on February 21st. The previous known record of high winter temperature was 24.5 °C (76.1 °F).
Keep, changing vote following article revision. This weather event is notable because it resulted in several new temperature records across a wide area.
SailingInABathTub (
talk) 17:28, 28 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Keep, Considered notable agreeing to
this users fact. We'll see what else can be considered to keep this article according to wikipedia's standards.
AustroHungarian1867 (
AustroHungarian1867) 4:50, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
Reply So which news website is considered acceptable?
AustroHungarian1867 (
talk) 4:29, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Keep, given that this event set numerous heat records across two continents, I think it has a good chance of passing
WP:10YT.
Devonian Wombat (
talk) 09:41, 2 March 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.