The result was redirect to 29th Canadian Ministry. Sandstein 16:57, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Articles about very minor events that fail the
will people still need this article to exist ten years from now test. These were created late last year by a British editor on analogy to British articles like
2021 British cabinet reshuffle, but that British example literally has dozens of people moving around, whereas these have far, far fewer, and the British one has almost five times as much sourcing as either of these do -- and WikiProject Canada has never had a consensus that standalone articles about Canadian cabinet shuffles were needed (as witness the fact that these are the only two Canadian cabinet shuffle articles that exist at all, even though Canada has been having cabinet shuffles for over 150 years.) Information about portfolio reassignments can be, and already is, handled in the existing
29th Canadian Ministry, without needing separate articles about the shuffles as standalone "events" in their own right.
I can imagine a scenario where a Canadian cabinet shuffle could accumulate more notability than usual as an event — but the one I can think of that might potentially have a genuine case for that isn't even either of these, and we certainly wouldn't need an indiscriminate box set of hundreds of articles about every Canadian cabinet shuffle that's ever happened.
And even if for some reason these were to be kept, they would have to be moved on
WP:ENGVAR grounds, as Canadian English doesn't call them reshuffles, we just call them shuffles.
Bearcat (
talk)
16:39, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 29th Canadian Ministry. Sandstein 16:57, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Articles about very minor events that fail the
will people still need this article to exist ten years from now test. These were created late last year by a British editor on analogy to British articles like
2021 British cabinet reshuffle, but that British example literally has dozens of people moving around, whereas these have far, far fewer, and the British one has almost five times as much sourcing as either of these do -- and WikiProject Canada has never had a consensus that standalone articles about Canadian cabinet shuffles were needed (as witness the fact that these are the only two Canadian cabinet shuffle articles that exist at all, even though Canada has been having cabinet shuffles for over 150 years.) Information about portfolio reassignments can be, and already is, handled in the existing
29th Canadian Ministry, without needing separate articles about the shuffles as standalone "events" in their own right.
I can imagine a scenario where a Canadian cabinet shuffle could accumulate more notability than usual as an event — but the one I can think of that might potentially have a genuine case for that isn't even either of these, and we certainly wouldn't need an indiscriminate box set of hundreds of articles about every Canadian cabinet shuffle that's ever happened.
And even if for some reason these were to be kept, they would have to be moved on
WP:ENGVAR grounds, as Canadian English doesn't call them reshuffles, we just call them shuffles.
Bearcat (
talk)
16:39, 26 October 2021 (UTC)