- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 21:04, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
2019 Netball World Cup
- 2019 Netball World Cup ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:TOOSOON. Unreferenced article about an event that is still 3 years away. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 17:27, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Vipinhari || talk 17:55, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Host city named and ref'd in the article, per WP:CRYSTAL - "Individual scheduled or expected future events should be included only if the event is notable and almost certain to take place." Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 19:26, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
- Keep. I added a source for the host, although there are a number of other sources on the bidding (there was only one bidder), confirming the host, citing various people as being excited, etc. There is not much that I can find beyond the bidding procedure and some qualification information, meaning that the article would remain a stub for now, but a useful stub nevertheless. I don't think WP:TOOSOON applies here: "If sources do not exist, it is generally too soon for an article on that topic to be considered". Sources DO exist for this one. No longer a penguin ( talk) 19:32, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
- Keep with thanks for the addition of a source. For an event only three years away, preparations will probably be already underway or will be soon. Insisting that the article be deleted now and recreated (when? soon, certainly) is just a bit much. The article can stay a stub for now without doing anybody any harm. Blythwood ( talk) 23:10, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:07, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:07, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 21:04, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
2019 Netball World Cup
- 2019 Netball World Cup ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:TOOSOON. Unreferenced article about an event that is still 3 years away. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 17:27, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Vipinhari || talk 17:55, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Host city named and ref'd in the article, per WP:CRYSTAL - "Individual scheduled or expected future events should be included only if the event is notable and almost certain to take place." Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 19:26, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
- Keep. I added a source for the host, although there are a number of other sources on the bidding (there was only one bidder), confirming the host, citing various people as being excited, etc. There is not much that I can find beyond the bidding procedure and some qualification information, meaning that the article would remain a stub for now, but a useful stub nevertheless. I don't think WP:TOOSOON applies here: "If sources do not exist, it is generally too soon for an article on that topic to be considered". Sources DO exist for this one. No longer a penguin ( talk) 19:32, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
- Keep with thanks for the addition of a source. For an event only three years away, preparations will probably be already underway or will be soon. Insisting that the article be deleted now and recreated (when? soon, certainly) is just a bit much. The article can stay a stub for now without doing anybody any harm. Blythwood ( talk) 23:10, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:07, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:07, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.