- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. G5 - article was created by a sockpuppet of a site-banned user, the only substantial edits by other users have been filling in reference templates. The Bushranger One ping only 20:23, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
2018 Pawan Hans Dauphin 2 crash
- 2018 Pawan Hans Dauphin 2 crash ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:NOTNEWS, WP:GNG, fails the criteria of WP:AIRCRASH. A non-notable crash. No notable persons, damage or effects. Wikipedia is NOT a repository of articles on every bump and scrape, if for no other reason than the servers have a finite capacity Petebutt ( talk) 03:52, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - fails single event, WP:NOTMEMORIAL. Atsme 📞 📧 04:03, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Baby miss fortune 11:29, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. Baby miss fortune 12:38, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Baby miss fortune 12:39, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - I wonder, why do we have so many of these types of news pieces? If this had any inkling of significance, it would belong on a list. As it stands, however, this will be nothing more than a memorial page to an unfortunate, but unnotable, incident. TheGracefulSlick ( talk) 17:01, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. G5 - article was created by a sockpuppet of a site-banned user, the only substantial edits by other users have been filling in reference templates. The Bushranger One ping only 20:23, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
2018 Pawan Hans Dauphin 2 crash
- 2018 Pawan Hans Dauphin 2 crash ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:NOTNEWS, WP:GNG, fails the criteria of WP:AIRCRASH. A non-notable crash. No notable persons, damage or effects. Wikipedia is NOT a repository of articles on every bump and scrape, if for no other reason than the servers have a finite capacity Petebutt ( talk) 03:52, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - fails single event, WP:NOTMEMORIAL. Atsme 📞 📧 04:03, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Baby miss fortune 11:29, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. Baby miss fortune 12:38, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Baby miss fortune 12:39, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - I wonder, why do we have so many of these types of news pieces? If this had any inkling of significance, it would belong on a list. As it stands, however, this will be nothing more than a memorial page to an unfortunate, but unnotable, incident. TheGracefulSlick ( talk) 17:01, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.