The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Non-notable (
WP:GNG,
WP:EVENT)
news event created by a user who is spamming Wikipedia with attacks by Muslims. Just about every mention of this attack post- the month it happened in is either a) just listing it in a long list of events or b) from another
single-news-cycle story about a couple of people getting arrested. I wouldn't even bother merging this to a bigger article. –
Roscelese (
talk ⋅
contribs) 05:30, 17 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Comment Nom failed
WP:BEFORE, which quickly disproves specious assertions above.
E.M.Gregory (
talk) 14:28, 17 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete: There was an increase in security in December 2014 because of a string of (never proven to be linked) attacks, but the impact of this specific one is not set to live long in collective memory. I swear this is a recreated article of a previous delete as well
'''tAD''' (
talk) 14:22, 17 November 2015 (UTC)reply
KEEP Article on a terrorist attack. Articles on terrorist attacks, hate crimes, and widely covered stabbing or shooting rampages are so normative on Wikipedia that nom ought to have an extraordinary justification for taking up the valuable time of editors by bringing such an article to AFD. The article is well sourced and passes
WP:GNG.
E.M.Gregory (
talk) 18:57, 17 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep. This event, which had happened in December 2014, has a long-lasting effect. For example, it has been noted in the timeline of "Terror attacks in France" in
this source dated November 2015.
My very best wishes (
talk) 16:20, 18 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep - Per everyone else. Also, attacking the credibility of the user who created this article implies much about your opinion about this.
75.80.175.107 (
talk) 23:33, 20 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep - Per
WP:GNG and
WP:CRIME. These events are clearly notable due to the number of news stories and coverage surrounding them, and they definitely made significant cultural impact. Covered by many secondary reliable sources. It doesn't matter who created the article; it has no merit whatsoever on the deletion of it per the
WP:AFD process - it's the subject and the content that matters. The user who wrote it is completely irrelevant.
~Oshwah~ (talk)(contribs) 23:37, 20 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep as I saw this referanced in the news just yesterday
Legacypac (
talk) 08:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Non-notable (
WP:GNG,
WP:EVENT)
news event created by a user who is spamming Wikipedia with attacks by Muslims. Just about every mention of this attack post- the month it happened in is either a) just listing it in a long list of events or b) from another
single-news-cycle story about a couple of people getting arrested. I wouldn't even bother merging this to a bigger article. –
Roscelese (
talk ⋅
contribs) 05:30, 17 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Comment Nom failed
WP:BEFORE, which quickly disproves specious assertions above.
E.M.Gregory (
talk) 14:28, 17 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete: There was an increase in security in December 2014 because of a string of (never proven to be linked) attacks, but the impact of this specific one is not set to live long in collective memory. I swear this is a recreated article of a previous delete as well
'''tAD''' (
talk) 14:22, 17 November 2015 (UTC)reply
KEEP Article on a terrorist attack. Articles on terrorist attacks, hate crimes, and widely covered stabbing or shooting rampages are so normative on Wikipedia that nom ought to have an extraordinary justification for taking up the valuable time of editors by bringing such an article to AFD. The article is well sourced and passes
WP:GNG.
E.M.Gregory (
talk) 18:57, 17 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep. This event, which had happened in December 2014, has a long-lasting effect. For example, it has been noted in the timeline of "Terror attacks in France" in
this source dated November 2015.
My very best wishes (
talk) 16:20, 18 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep - Per everyone else. Also, attacking the credibility of the user who created this article implies much about your opinion about this.
75.80.175.107 (
talk) 23:33, 20 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep - Per
WP:GNG and
WP:CRIME. These events are clearly notable due to the number of news stories and coverage surrounding them, and they definitely made significant cultural impact. Covered by many secondary reliable sources. It doesn't matter who created the article; it has no merit whatsoever on the deletion of it per the
WP:AFD process - it's the subject and the content that matters. The user who wrote it is completely irrelevant.
~Oshwah~ (talk)(contribs) 23:37, 20 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep as I saw this referanced in the news just yesterday
Legacypac (
talk) 08:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.