The result was keep. Cleanup and and addtional sourcing appears to have addressed the deletion concerns. ( non-admin closure) Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 01:13, 25 October 2011 (UTC) reply
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Violation of WP:NOTCRYSTALBALL filled with unsourced and speculated informations. An article of a total mess. Definately not compatible with Wikipedia's mission of verifiability. Also we, at Wikipedia, aren't fortunetellers and we do not predict the future. Farine ( talk) 14:18, 9 October 2011 (UTC) reply
Don't delete it. We can find sources for this info. 68.44.179.54 ( talk) 13:27, 9 October 2011 (UTC) reply
Just so that we keep track of the votes here, that makes 2 votes in favor of to keep ( 68.44.179.54 and Lugnuts) and 2 votes in favor of to delete ( Farine and ClaretAsh) Farine ( talk) 17:58, 9 October 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Cleanup and and addtional sourcing appears to have addressed the deletion concerns. ( non-admin closure) Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 01:13, 25 October 2011 (UTC) reply
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Violation of WP:NOTCRYSTALBALL filled with unsourced and speculated informations. An article of a total mess. Definately not compatible with Wikipedia's mission of verifiability. Also we, at Wikipedia, aren't fortunetellers and we do not predict the future. Farine ( talk) 14:18, 9 October 2011 (UTC) reply
Don't delete it. We can find sources for this info. 68.44.179.54 ( talk) 13:27, 9 October 2011 (UTC) reply
Just so that we keep track of the votes here, that makes 2 votes in favor of to keep ( 68.44.179.54 and Lugnuts) and 2 votes in favor of to delete ( Farine and ClaretAsh) Farine ( talk) 17:58, 9 October 2011 (UTC) reply