The result was keep. What the organizers can rent, etc. are not valid reasons for keeping, but whether coverage is local matters not if they meet the criteria of significant secondary sources that can be presumed reliable. Unless the local papers can be refuted, it meets GNG. Der Wohltempierte Fuchs ( talk) 00:14, 10 March 2009 (UTC) reply
This appears to fail our notability guidelines. A little coverage in the LA Times and CityBeat isn't enough. dougweller ( talk) 17:55, 5 March 2009 (UTC) reply
Furthermore, Cazort - I don't know if a google search is sound evidence for either inclusion or exclusion as stated in wiki's Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions section entitled Google Test. KurtVan ( talk) 14:56, 9 March 2009 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. What the organizers can rent, etc. are not valid reasons for keeping, but whether coverage is local matters not if they meet the criteria of significant secondary sources that can be presumed reliable. Unless the local papers can be refuted, it meets GNG. Der Wohltempierte Fuchs ( talk) 00:14, 10 March 2009 (UTC) reply
This appears to fail our notability guidelines. A little coverage in the LA Times and CityBeat isn't enough. dougweller ( talk) 17:55, 5 March 2009 (UTC) reply
Furthermore, Cazort - I don't know if a google search is sound evidence for either inclusion or exclusion as stated in wiki's Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions section entitled Google Test. KurtVan ( talk) 14:56, 9 March 2009 (UTC) reply