The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep There needs to be a wider discussion. There are a number of similar articles in this category. Why is this one been singled out.
DjlnDjln (
talk)
19:19, 6 October 2020 (UTC)reply
And to, answer your question, although every W-League individual club season article fails NSEASONS, some of them do look to pass GNG. I am nominating this one on its own because it clearly fails
WP:GNG and doesn't seem to have potential to pass GNG
Spiderone20:38, 6 October 2020 (UTC)reply
I think it is best to bundle all the ones deemed not notable and have a wider discussion. As you say, some are more notable than others. It will save a lot of messing about.
DjlnDjln (
talk)
21:41, 6 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep Not sure how this fails
WP:GNG - there are multiple sources from independent reliable sources - Melbourne Leader, Herald Sun, Canberra Times, Sydney Morning Herald, Newcastle Herald, The Women's Game (FTBL - formerly FourFourTwo), Geelong Advertiser, ABC News, Sun-Herald --
SuperJew (
talk)
06:59, 8 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep. Per
WP:NSEASONS, the article "consists mainly of well-sourced prose, not just statistics and lists of players". The guideline doesn't offer fail criteria in terms of competition level, just examples of competitions that will likely garner significant coverage.
Hack (
talk)
05:18, 10 October 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep There needs to be a wider discussion. There are a number of similar articles in this category. Why is this one been singled out.
DjlnDjln (
talk)
19:19, 6 October 2020 (UTC)reply
And to, answer your question, although every W-League individual club season article fails NSEASONS, some of them do look to pass GNG. I am nominating this one on its own because it clearly fails
WP:GNG and doesn't seem to have potential to pass GNG
Spiderone20:38, 6 October 2020 (UTC)reply
I think it is best to bundle all the ones deemed not notable and have a wider discussion. As you say, some are more notable than others. It will save a lot of messing about.
DjlnDjln (
talk)
21:41, 6 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep Not sure how this fails
WP:GNG - there are multiple sources from independent reliable sources - Melbourne Leader, Herald Sun, Canberra Times, Sydney Morning Herald, Newcastle Herald, The Women's Game (FTBL - formerly FourFourTwo), Geelong Advertiser, ABC News, Sun-Herald --
SuperJew (
talk)
06:59, 8 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep. Per
WP:NSEASONS, the article "consists mainly of well-sourced prose, not just statistics and lists of players". The guideline doesn't offer fail criteria in terms of competition level, just examples of competitions that will likely garner significant coverage.
Hack (
talk)
05:18, 10 October 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.