![]() | This discussion was subject to a
deletion review on 2010 February 14. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
The result was speedy keep. The nominator states that: "Actually the closing was proper but the result was wrong, there was a general consensus on deleting the article. The problem is that it was closed and nobody challenged it. That's why it was nominated again for deletion." Deletion review is that way. Fences& Windows 01:37, 14 February 2010 (UTC) reply
This is a second proposal for the deletion of this page. I believe it is important to delete this page since there is not such a thing as Conspiracy Theory regarding an event as an earthquake. The scientific grounds on tectonic plates are very clear. The so called theories are nothing but not notable gossip invented by some yellow-journalism newspapers in Europe. Thanks -- Camilo Sanchez ( talk) 19:06, 12 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Even debunking or disparaging references are adequate, as they establish the notability of the theory outside of its group of adherents. 93.96.148.42 ( talk) 17:21, 13 February 2010 (UTC) reply
I would like to challenge the closing of this AfD proposal. People need at least 30 days to reach consensus. Thanks -- Camilo Sanchez ( talk) 01:42, 14 February 2010 (UTC) reply
![]() | This discussion was subject to a
deletion review on 2010 February 14. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
The result was speedy keep. The nominator states that: "Actually the closing was proper but the result was wrong, there was a general consensus on deleting the article. The problem is that it was closed and nobody challenged it. That's why it was nominated again for deletion." Deletion review is that way. Fences& Windows 01:37, 14 February 2010 (UTC) reply
This is a second proposal for the deletion of this page. I believe it is important to delete this page since there is not such a thing as Conspiracy Theory regarding an event as an earthquake. The scientific grounds on tectonic plates are very clear. The so called theories are nothing but not notable gossip invented by some yellow-journalism newspapers in Europe. Thanks -- Camilo Sanchez ( talk) 19:06, 12 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Even debunking or disparaging references are adequate, as they establish the notability of the theory outside of its group of adherents. 93.96.148.42 ( talk) 17:21, 13 February 2010 (UTC) reply
I would like to challenge the closing of this AfD proposal. People need at least 30 days to reach consensus. Thanks -- Camilo Sanchez ( talk) 01:42, 14 February 2010 (UTC) reply