- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 16:51, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- 2010 Fountain City Classic ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Utterly routine, fails GNG / WP:NSPORTSEVENT. The game ended a 6-game win streak in a rivalry and decided a conference championship, with neither team having a significant post-season ( 2010 NCAA Division II football season). UW Dawgs ( talk) 01:55, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 02:25, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 02:25, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 02:25, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
- Preliminary comments lots of valid choices with this one. Unlike the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2012 Texas A&M vs. Alabama football game, this article has two sources and at least one of them has commentary to go with it; but one of them doesn't appear to be independent. The other wouldn't load on my machine right now so I'm reserving comment. However, it does look like there is enough published data to avoid the WP:OR dangers. Next-- WP:IMPACT -- the game does appear to be part of a series Fountain City Classic which appears to be a historic one. As to the "routine" argument, this article shows greater coverage to pass the WP:ROUTIUNE threshold. More reviews to come.-- Paul McDonald ( talk) 12:58, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
- Delete non notable WP:ROUTINE coverage.- UCO2009bluejay ( talk) 00:03, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
- Merge content to Fountain City Classic. it's the only "game" article that I can find, and the content can help make the master article a little better.-- Paul McDonald ( talk) 20:56, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 02:10, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 02:10, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
- Delete. The established editorial practice among college football editors is to favor season articles and to disfavor articles about individual games. Regular season games do not warrant stand-alone articles unless there is something truly historic, which does not appear to be the case here with this regular season Division II game. Compare Wikipedia:WikiProject College football/Notability#Single game notability discussion library. Cbl62 ( talk) 13:51, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 16:51, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- 2010 Fountain City Classic ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Utterly routine, fails GNG / WP:NSPORTSEVENT. The game ended a 6-game win streak in a rivalry and decided a conference championship, with neither team having a significant post-season ( 2010 NCAA Division II football season). UW Dawgs ( talk) 01:55, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 02:25, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 02:25, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 02:25, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
- Preliminary comments lots of valid choices with this one. Unlike the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2012 Texas A&M vs. Alabama football game, this article has two sources and at least one of them has commentary to go with it; but one of them doesn't appear to be independent. The other wouldn't load on my machine right now so I'm reserving comment. However, it does look like there is enough published data to avoid the WP:OR dangers. Next-- WP:IMPACT -- the game does appear to be part of a series Fountain City Classic which appears to be a historic one. As to the "routine" argument, this article shows greater coverage to pass the WP:ROUTIUNE threshold. More reviews to come.-- Paul McDonald ( talk) 12:58, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
- Delete non notable WP:ROUTINE coverage.- UCO2009bluejay ( talk) 00:03, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
- Merge content to Fountain City Classic. it's the only "game" article that I can find, and the content can help make the master article a little better.-- Paul McDonald ( talk) 20:56, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 02:10, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 02:10, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
- Delete. The established editorial practice among college football editors is to favor season articles and to disfavor articles about individual games. Regular season games do not warrant stand-alone articles unless there is something truly historic, which does not appear to be the case here with this regular season Division II game. Compare Wikipedia:WikiProject College football/Notability#Single game notability discussion library. Cbl62 ( talk) 13:51, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.