- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 14:38, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
2007 ICC World Twenty20 statistics
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- 2007 ICC World Twenty20 statistics ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
These articles provide detailed statistical information for individual editions of the ICC World Twenty20 with no supporting prose. A clear case of WP:NOTSTATS. – Ianblair23 (talk) 13:22, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
I am also nominating the following related pages:
- 2009 ICC World Twenty20 statistics ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- 2010 ICC World Twenty20 statistics ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- 2012 ICC World Twenty20 statistics ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- 2014 ICC World Twenty20 statistics ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. – Ianblair23 (talk) 13:22, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
- Delete all per nom. The two most important stats - most runs and most wickets - could/should be included in the main article(s), cited in the prose. There's no need for these stand-alone stat-fests. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 15:39, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
- Delete, merging anything useful to the article about the tournament. Far too many stats. Blue Square Thing ( talk) 09:25, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 14:38, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
2007 ICC World Twenty20 statistics
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- 2007 ICC World Twenty20 statistics ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
These articles provide detailed statistical information for individual editions of the ICC World Twenty20 with no supporting prose. A clear case of WP:NOTSTATS. – Ianblair23 (talk) 13:22, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
I am also nominating the following related pages:
- 2009 ICC World Twenty20 statistics ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- 2010 ICC World Twenty20 statistics ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- 2012 ICC World Twenty20 statistics ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- 2014 ICC World Twenty20 statistics ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. – Ianblair23 (talk) 13:22, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
- Delete all per nom. The two most important stats - most runs and most wickets - could/should be included in the main article(s), cited in the prose. There's no need for these stand-alone stat-fests. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 15:39, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
- Delete, merging anything useful to the article about the tournament. Far too many stats. Blue Square Thing ( talk) 09:25, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.