The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Is this really notable, it is an under 19 tournament featuring associates? I don't think it passes
WP:CRIN While I think the under-19 world cup is notable does this really count? The only reason I haven't put it as
WP:PROD is because of it being an ICC tournament albeit at under 19 level. All views welcome
CreativeNorth (
talk)
16:14, 5 August 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete per
WP:SPORTSEVENT, which this doesn't seem to meet ("ICC Americas" is at least one or two steps below the main Under-19 World Cup, which I think is the "top series" being referred to by the guideline).
M Imtiaz (
talk ·
contribs)
18:07, 5 August 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete: Spiffy, so it was a regional qualifier for a youth tournament; what makes that notable? Not under SPORTSEVENT, NOTSTATS nor
WP:ROUTINE, which it all fails. Beyond that, the "espncricinfo.com" source is a blatant press release which ends with "Support the World Cup bound Under-19s Team Canada and assist in pre World Cup outdoor and indoor training and preparation. Donations can be sent to the Canadian Cricket Association, 1185 Eglinton Avenue E, Suite 604, Toronto. Tax-deductible receipts are supplied for donations" -- it absolutely does not support notability.
Ravenswing 06:48, 15 August 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Is this really notable, it is an under 19 tournament featuring associates? I don't think it passes
WP:CRIN While I think the under-19 world cup is notable does this really count? The only reason I haven't put it as
WP:PROD is because of it being an ICC tournament albeit at under 19 level. All views welcome
CreativeNorth (
talk)
16:14, 5 August 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete per
WP:SPORTSEVENT, which this doesn't seem to meet ("ICC Americas" is at least one or two steps below the main Under-19 World Cup, which I think is the "top series" being referred to by the guideline).
M Imtiaz (
talk ·
contribs)
18:07, 5 August 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete: Spiffy, so it was a regional qualifier for a youth tournament; what makes that notable? Not under SPORTSEVENT, NOTSTATS nor
WP:ROUTINE, which it all fails. Beyond that, the "espncricinfo.com" source is a blatant press release which ends with "Support the World Cup bound Under-19s Team Canada and assist in pre World Cup outdoor and indoor training and preparation. Donations can be sent to the Canadian Cricket Association, 1185 Eglinton Avenue E, Suite 604, Toronto. Tax-deductible receipts are supplied for donations" -- it absolutely does not support notability.
Ravenswing 06:48, 15 August 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.